<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in Why People Like Kurzweil Get it Wrong</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/why_people_like_kurzweil_get_it_wrong/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 01:23:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why People Like Kurzweil Get it Wrong</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-people-like-kurzweil-get-it-wrong#comment-8970290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 01:23:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why People Like Kurzweil Get it Wrong</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-people-like-kurzweil-get-it-wrong#comment-4862662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, the sad fate of CSR is also pretty darn surprising. I wanted to try Dragon Nat Speaking software for years and finally somebody gave it to me as a gift as week. I was shocked how accurate it was!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:05:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why People Like Kurzweil Get it Wrong</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/why-people-like-kurzweil-get-it-wrong#comment-4862661</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do you say they fail? An AMAZING number of his are exactly right, which is in fact pretty surprising? I don't get it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:04:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>