<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in Where Twitter Fits</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/where_twitter_fits/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:02:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Where Twitter Fits</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/where-twitter-fits#comment-4885837</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting. I really like this line of thinking and have wondered about this myself... When I reply publicly (non-DM) I try to repeat part of the original tweet for the convenience of readers who don't know the context. It's like the difference between tweeting "Dude! Wow! http://tinyurl..." and "Finally--mayonnaise that tastes like bacon! http://tinyurl..."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@urbanhipster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:02:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Twitter Fits</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/where-twitter-fits#comment-4882755</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tend to use twitter for networking within my town. For instance, I've found an incredible amount of really cool people here in Phoenix, that I might not have ever run into. And on top of that, I've found a huge amount of resources through them. I think its social-blogging, more than just micro-blogging. IM + Blog in a way. I am guilty of having a lot of @replies lately on my account, and I'm not great at DMing. but yeah, i think if you look at it as a combination of Blogging + Instant Messaging, I find it's easier to make progress with finding it useful&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markdudlik</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:53:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Twitter Fits</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/where-twitter-fits#comment-4877077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, well in that case, retracted. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">not relevant</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:11:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Twitter Fits</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/where-twitter-fits#comment-4876314</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, I missed your point. Yes, I would agree with that. Posting the same content is spamish. Agreed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The problem is that I didn't post the same thing twice--they were two DIFFERENT things; they were just both about Twitter. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Miessler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 02:00:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Twitter Fits</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/where-twitter-fits#comment-4876140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wasn't referring to tweeting once to direct people to your blog, I was referring to tweeting more than once with the same content. You've tweeted more than once, the exact same tweet with the same content. I didn't mean tweating as a method of directing people to your site, but tweeting it repeatedly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">not relevant</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:46:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Twitter Fits</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/where-twitter-fits#comment-4876120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To re-tweet content directing others to you blog, or re-tweeting anything for that matter, is considered in bad taste (it borders on SPAM). /unsubscribe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">not relevant</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:44:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Twitter Fits</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/where-twitter-fits#comment-4876123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah posted this twice.... get the point?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">not relevant</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:43:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Twitter Fits</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/where-twitter-fits#comment-4876115</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you're mistaken. It's considered quite legitimate for people to use Twitter to refer to their own content. Check again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Miessler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:43:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Twitter Fits</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/where-twitter-fits#comment-4876084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Re-tweeting the same text pointing people to your blog (or any content for that matter) as you've been doing, is considered bad taste... /unsubscribe&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">not relevant</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:40:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>