<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in Thoughts About Sex and Sexism, Spawned by a &amp;#8220;Sexist&amp;#8221; Advertisement</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:30:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thoughts About Sex and Sexism, Spawned by a &amp;#8220;Sexist&amp;#8221; Advertisement</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/thoughts-about-sex-and-sexism-spawned-by-a-sexist-advertisement#comment-4358690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Shenlon,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm assuming you are a woman, please disregard this post if it is not so.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;"This would be great, but I think it’s far easier for women to think that way than for men to do so. I’m not saying it’s not possible, but most men tend to be naturally shallow, and have one track minds. Having a dual idea of women would be quite difficult. The female mind is much better at thinking of things that way."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you are a woman yourself, aren't you painting all men with the same brush by these lines (a one-track opinion, if I may?) ? This rather weakens your argument that women are deep thinkers and are capable of making the right distinctions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">interloper</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:30:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts About Sex and Sexism, Spawned by a &amp;#8220;Sexist&amp;#8221; Advertisement</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/thoughts-about-sex-and-sexism-spawned-by-a-sexist-advertisement#comment-4358691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, if I understand you, what you're advocating is that women and men have a dual understanding of each other: sex objects sometimes, respectable citizens and real people other times.  If I understand you, this is necessary for equality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;This would be great, but I think it's far easier for women to think that way than for men to do so.  I'm not saying it's not possible, but most men tend to be naturally shallow, and have one track minds.  Having a dual idea of women would be quite difficult.  The female mind is much better at thinking of things that way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shenlon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:53:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts About Sex and Sexism, Spawned by a &amp;#8220;Sexist&amp;#8221; Advertisement</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/thoughts-about-sex-and-sexism-spawned-by-a-sexist-advertisement#comment-4358689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sorry but did you just say that women respect men?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darren</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 04:13:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts About Sex and Sexism, Spawned by a &amp;#8220;Sexist&amp;#8221; Advertisement</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/thoughts-about-sex-and-sexism-spawned-by-a-sexist-advertisement#comment-4358692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just one note - men and women don't have the same ranges, or at least, the distribution over those ranges is different for each gender. There are more males at both the lower and the higher end, in general.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GBM</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:35:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>