<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in The Tsunami &amp;#8220;Hacker&amp;#8221; Story</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:46:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Tsunami &amp;#8220;Hacker&amp;#8221; Story</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-tsunami-hacker-story#comment-4350075</link><description>Bad form, Yeah...conviction worthy...I don't really know if I would agree with that..Will it make me be on my toes from now on, even more so that I am already...DEFINITELY</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael S Black</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:46:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Tsunami &amp;#8220;Hacker&amp;#8221; Story</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-tsunami-hacker-story#comment-4350074</link><description>It is very difficult to define morality. Most laws are/or should be based off of intent. What this guys did that was major wrong was lie. As an information security professional he should have told the truth right away.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ken</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:41:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Tsunami &amp;#8220;Hacker&amp;#8221; Story</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-tsunami-hacker-story#comment-4350073</link><description>If you read into it, though, Michael, the issue was deception rather than the act itself. He lied about what he did for quite a bit and then recanted later. Bad form.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not sure it deserves what he got, but still...bad form.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danielrm26</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:13:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Tsunami &amp;#8220;Hacker&amp;#8221; Story</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-tsunami-hacker-story#comment-4350072</link><description>If you can get this kind of sentence for simply adding "../../../" to a URL, why oh WHY do we still have script kiddies??!! I do this all the time at work when I am investigating sites that "appear" to be phishing sites trying to look my companies online portal, does this mean I can no longer do this if they reside in the UK? I can't do any investigative work in trying to determine whether they are ripping our customers off? I suppose I then must contact  LEO and ask some officer to do this. What kind of priority can I expect the UK Law Enforcement Community to give my "possible" phish site? I think the implications of this ruling are WAY MORE imperative to pay attention to than the individual repercussions of Mr. Cuthbert, as sad as they may be.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael S Black</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:54:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Tsunami &amp;#8220;Hacker&amp;#8221; Story</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-tsunami-hacker-story#comment-4350071</link><description>Lots of people are behind bars because they did something stupid.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Honestly I think stupity is no less evil than immorality or malice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:20:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>