-
Website
http://dmiessler.com/ -
Original page
http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-nice-guy-paradox-solved -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ax0n
5 comments · 1 points
-
Maxo
12 comments · 2 points
-
Michael Blume
5 comments · 1 points
-
cooperati
179 comments · 2 points
-
dapxin
39 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Beyond the intelligence, charm, etc. we're all animals and there's no denying that a "man being a man" is going to attract me more so than a man who isn't. I hate to relate it to caveman days but I am...minus the bop on the head.
I guarantee you that most women would prefer that a man approach them versus they approach a man. A man needs to step-up to be noticed.
Stop denying your animal nature, men...and then you're bound to "capture" the woman you desire.
Warren
Like you said, he becomes a doormat for the girl and I think some respect is lost for him not having a spine.
- sob
The time and effort I spent trying to attract women I instead put into simply enjoying life. I stopped worrying about how I looked or if something I said would cross some boundary. I had more time to exercise and concentrate on my hobbies ( which were inherently more rewarding anyway ). By deciding that women were a nuisance and not a primary value, I got back in touch with my philosophy, had time for reading, saved a ton of money by not going out to meet women - in general, I had a much better life and didn't miss the chase one little bit.
I've been married now for almost seven years. My wife thought I was a jerk when we first met - and I didn't care! I was fat and happy and busy doing interesting things. One more woman who didn't find me attractive = no big hairy deal! Later, SHE was the one asking ME out. Once she started asking me out, other women suddenly wanted my attention too. And I was mostly too busy having fun doing things that didn't involve "dating". Eventually *I* moved in with *her*, and three years later we decided to make it permanent.
And that's how it should always be anyway. Guys, get on with your lives. Women are an expensive and annoying distraction from the truly great things in life.
You wrote: "Women may be annoying and a waste to many men, but those words come from hurt. They come from frustration."
Scott clearly and emphatically stated this - I believe he was saying that the hurt and frustration is what caused him to withdraw and find himself.
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Entertainment/story?...
She had some very interesting observations relating to dating.
"Physical Features" are not what attracts women. Think about it. The things women look for, a guy who's in shape, well groomed, a musician, money, a sense of humor... These are all outward obvious symptoms of being mentally healthy. Women are attracted to someone who can help them make smart healthy babies.
Daniel Miessler's point here is excellent and it really does display the "nice guy" paradox very well. A woman wants a nice guy but also wants to be dating up the social ladder, not down. Groveling is the least sexy thing in the world because it pegs you below her. She wants a guy who has enough social status or confidence to walk away from her at the drop of a hat, yet doesn't and is still kind to her. Paradox indeed.
Jenny:
Calling this conversation sexists makes as much sense as calling statements like "Men are taller than women" or "Woman live longer than men" sexist. You would first need to prove that the ideas are, in general, wrong, and second you'd need to prove the the intent behind the statements was intended to hurt or minimize a gender. In this case you can prove neither. Men and woman are just very different and understating those differences is what makes getting along possible.
Fuck dating, fuck all of society. Who are you? If you can answer this then you can find the woman or man of your dreams.
I'm surprised that we've collectively managed to hold on to our heuristics and "rules" for so long. They build a strong relationship in roughly the same way that strong houses can be built on shifting sand.
Lo and behold, I became desirable. I've been married for almost 13 years now.
As much as I'd like to say the screw-it attitude helped, I think it was more a matter of self-confidence. Demonstrating that I didn't need someone to validate my life helped me make it a more appealing one to somebody else.
And guys? If you weigh over two hundred pounds and it's not due to muscle, you need to dump the beer and pizza and work off the gut. Women won't ever admit it, but when they see a fat guy, they think "if he can't take care of himself he won't be any good at taking care of me or any babies that come along." Even if she's completely self-sufficient, she's thinking this.
Here are my "stats": I'm quite tall (6'5"), have a fairly athletic build (I work out several times a week) and am reasonably intelligent (IQ 140). However, it was the assertiveness that was the lynchpin to meeting women. The trick was to simply start approaching people who caught my eye or who intrigued me for one reason or another. Now, if I had walked up to some woman and stared at my feet, said "Uhm, er... ahh" and whatever, I'd have gotten nowhere. Walk up and try to meet them. Nicely, confidently, calmly (sanely!). Make eye contact. Smile (not too much!). Be interested in them and if you aren't, don't bother even approaching.
Quick note... bars SUCK for meeting people (unless you are looking for a one-night stand which is fine but will get very old and unsatisfying after a few years of being single. Oh, and be honest! Don't try to lie or cajole someone into the sack... be a decent person and find a willing partner). You should try to meet people in places where you and they have a common interest or common interaction.
Yeah, in my dating years I got rejected, dumped and ignored but that is probably more character building than anything. On a more positive note, the more people you meet and date (or just have a one-nighter with) the better you will know what YOU are looking for in a partner. You may find, as I did, that going for looks alone often ends up hollow and boring. Turns out, I have a strong preference for intelligence! I simply cannot tolerate being with a cute, but dumb, woman.
In the end, I met my wife by being assertive and that was and is the best thing that has ever happened to me (well, right behind having the 2 cute little babies we made!)
This wisdom is straight from www.doubleyourdating.com.
Subscribe to the email list and you'll see what I mean.
If you are ugly there is nothing you can do about it and women will never even give you the time of day. If you are nice and ugly, then they will talk to you and be your friend, while telling you about their boyfriends to politely say "get the fuck out of here, you have no chance."
I am at a place similar to the beginning of what Scott has described. I'm graduating college in 2 weeks, and I haven't had a date or any sort of meaningful contact with a woman in two years. YEARS. Talk about making people bitter and angry. I'm tired of complaining about how it sucks to be single, so I'm just not trying anymore. I spend my weekends programming, because unlike women at least a PHP interpreter can tell me what I'm doing wrong. The idea of living my life for myself is the only thing that gives me any comfort.
Being short makes meeting women incredibly difficult. Short and ugly are, in my experience, impossible to overcome. There is nothing worse than being the shortest guy at a party, women won't even look at you. Despite being creepy and a complete asshole dirt bag (k-fed anybody?), the other guy at the party looks way better than you because he's 6 inches taller than you. Height is just as important as confidence.
You can practice being more assertive and confidant, but if you're short it's like having a permanent handicap.
Can you solve the "nice guy paradox" by being confidant and still nice? Probably, but there are more factors to the issue than confidence if you ask me. You can be 100% right in your convictions, be confidant, and people will still ignore you and push you aside if you're not tall enough or not attractive enough.
If you're short or ugly it doesn't matter how confidant you are. Period. You have a better chance of getting hit by lighting, winning the lottery, and curing cancer in the same day than you do getting a girl's attention.
- Women are most attracted to confidence and humor.
- Physical appearance isn't as important as it is to men, though you have to be clean and well kept.
- Niceness usually translates to neediness or a push-over. Just treat a woman like you would any other friend.
it has been around for ages and has been a real eye-opener for me.
shout out to Axl Rose.
I distinguish between good & nice... good is loving me, being faithful, & taking care of his family; this is what is expected of a good husband... nice is getting me flowers or taking me out to dinner. My husband is a good husband in general, but he's inconsistently nice to me, and it keeps me interested in him, because I don't expect him to be nice to me.
I don't expect anything for Valentines day or our Anniversary, why buy into that shit? But on some random Friday night, when my husband says "lets go out for dinner," it means twice as much to me.
Doing what is expected of you isn't exciting, and if let your woman expect you to do nice things, she'll just walk all over you. (On the other hand, if you're an asshole to her and she sticks around, she's just desperate, and I'm sure that turns guys off.)
I think the problem is that many women expect too much from men; their fathers gave them everything, and they expect you too too. Many people are just generally selfish, but if they're hot enough, some nice-guys put up with them because they think they can't do better... I think it's a perpetual cycle, you guys need to break & stop pandering to bitchy women.
The main advice I'd have is that guys have to be ok with being rejected... if being rejected doesn't phase you, you can be your own man, be confident in yourself, & wait for the right woman to come along. You need to be ok with stepping up & asking out a chick, and not dreading she might shoot you down. (Women can smell fear.) You need to be happy with yourself before you can be happy with someone else. (If all that makes you happy is to get laid but never get married, you better be gorgeous and have no soul.) I need time to do my own thing, and so I need a guy who has his own things to do too. If my husband's life centered around me, it would drive me nuts!
Oh, and this is definitely true:
“if he can’t take care of himself he won’t be any good at taking care of me or any babies that come along.” Even if she’s completely self-sufficient, she’s thinking this.
So is this:
Quick note… bars SUCK for meeting people...
Approach a women in the section of your interest at the book store, take a class of some sort (art, athletic, music), volunteer your time (that's probably bonus points), etc.
I some have sympathy for you guys who are short and/or downright ugly... I'm sorry, but that's just how the gene pool works... there are just as many lonely fat & ugly girls out there with lots of cats.
People only remember your most defining features. When a person says another person is "nice", that means the person didn't make an impression.. aka "Boring".
It's ok to be boring to some people, because that means you are interesting to other people, who will in turn be more interesting to you. That is unless you're just looking for someone with a good body, but understand that sort of person will also be looking for the same.
Learn the difference between what people want and what they say they want.
Only once that foundation of primal respect is in place can the higher-order offerings such as kindness be appreciated.
[/quote]
Hmm, I'm intrigued ... how do I subscribe to your magazine ?
It's more logical to recognize that women won't make men happy, and that men should stop trying to get them at all (whether by being nice, by being masculine, or by trying to trick women into thinking they're one of either) as a path to their own fulfillment.
Learning the rules of nature is important, but the implementation of the rules changes with circumstances and events. What works now is based on similar (though flexible) principles to what worked in the cave, but the application may look entirely different because we aren't in the cave anymore.
1)Flashiness
2)Make it look like its an opportunity to go out with you.
3)To be a Stud, all you have to do is act like one!
Special Rules to special kind of women....(Ones you can get laid with, real quick)
1) Buy them gifts, treat them with disrespect.
2) Bullshit a lot!
3) Act like you are too busy in life and that you are making a big sacrifise by spending time with her. Dont tell her that!
4)All this messages should be conveyed very subtely.
5) Make it look like there are a lot of women who want to get lucky with you!
So its really not about how you look, how much money you have, what car you drive (i dont even own a car haha). None of that matters and its not the point. The point is, women want a challenge, they want to be the ones pursuing for once in their life. They want a man who is not always available, where all the details about his character is not known. How interesting is someone if you already know everything about them?
You can be much more effective if you see the dating process and dealing with women more like a sales cycle. I think the main issue with guys is they find this ONE WOMAN that gave them the time of day and perhaps a number, then they put all their efforts into that one woman. This is about the worst thing men can do. By limiting your options, just like in sales, you'll exhaust yourself thinking "this is my one and only chance, this is the last sale I'll ever make" when its totally not the case.
Just like in sales, you need to:
a) Work a lot of leads.
Get as many phone numbers as possible, take the initiative, say hello, and just fill up your cell phone with as many as you can get. If you aren't desperate, you wont sound desperate, and you wont have to fake confidence (you cant fake confidence with women). Just man up for once in your life and approach a woman. The best part about this is that is gets easier and easer as you go along.
b) Asking questions or taking action that helps you judge how interested they are in you.
Why continue to call a client to see if they want to buy when you know they don't have the money or its not a good fit? Same with women. Its so sad to see men chase after this one woman when there is no interest there. A wise man once told me "whoever has the least amount of interest in a relationship, business or otherwise, wins."
So, I'll to you from experience, being a nice guy isn't the issue. I'm one of the nicest guys thats out there, and women are all over me because I ask the questions, I do the interviewing, I do the picking and choosing. I let them talk and I judge for myself if this woman is right for me.
Another wise man once said "Don't forget, women get rejected too!"
It all comes down to passing on your genes. You are a machine programmed to do this. It's sad but true that a chicken is an egg's way of making another egg. Perfectly logical. The eggs knows nothing about it. It's just how it is. Good genes get selected for, bad ones don't.
So, this is why guys are not naturally faithful. 5 mins work and he can reproduce. A woman, on the other hand, makes a commitment of years when she has a kid. It's in her interest to have a nice guy who is not wife beater, who brings home the bacon and who is a sensitive man who likes to her flowers and all that stuff. But... a sneaky mating with a dominant male may endow her with a genetically fitter kid. It's why women cheat and why it happens mostly at a their most fertile time of the month.
It's why in many hospitals the blood group of the baby is not advertised on the little clipboard by the cot. 10% of babies are not born to the fathers they're supposed to be the offspring of.
So, there you have it. Good old biological programming. If you don't believe it Google the book Sperm Wars and read it.
You know some men are NICE because heck they are actually NICE people. And believe that people should be treated with respect and kindness. In fact if your only being nice to attract women, thats not really being nice at all, that is just looking out for you own interests.
This article is absolutely right. It's being nice when you have other moves you could possibly make that shows us your true character, and having moral depth and brains are the things most intelligent women will be attracted to.
Note that I did not say that these are the things that BEAUTIFUL women are attracted to. I'm not saying that being beautiful and being smart are mutually exclusive, but if you think about it statistically (I won't go into details. I'm sure everyone here can do their own math), it's improbable. The exceptions are: If women are smart, they are often also beautiful because they have noticed that being perceived as attractive has its advantages.
So, it's all a very shallow game. Re: Mat's comment that women only like tall, good-looking men: You know what? Men only like thin, good-looking women. It's called sex appeal. You feel it -- why shouldn't we?
1. How to pronounce Nietzsche.
2. "Synergy of the marketecture" is my new favorite phrase.
On a more serious note -- I totally disagree that most people know or somehow believe this:
"that women like 'nice' guys"
Maybe it's just I've lived in a city with Tom Leykis on the airwaves for the past several years, and have been exposed to a different peer group, but the revelation that women do not fawn over nice guys is not new for many.
Sure, they don't like to be beat up by abusive partners, but it doesn't mean you have to fawn over them and worship their every action.
Now, knowing they do not necessarily like nice guys; and still being one (for whatever reason) are two totally different stories.
Another thought always crosses to mind (which can be applied equally to men & women) and was echoed by earlier commenters:
* Whenever I hear women talking about being on various dating sites, but yet they could stand to lose 30 lbs, make $20k more a year, watch a few less reruns of Desperate Housewives & Sex in the City -- then I think, why don't they just spend their time improving themselves instead of seeking out a mate, at this juncture?
(and I could give myself the same advice too, minus the Sex in the City... :))
I was single for a long period, once, and then, I got lucky somehow, and found myself with a very nice girl. 4 months later, I fell in love with her, and as soon as I let that be known, I had girls- whom I wouldn't have had a chance with when I was single- come up and flirt with me or do something to get my attention. and you know what, I was stupid enough to fall for it. I was. dumped my girlfriend went out with 2 or 3 of those girls, realized they had nothing I wanted (and that they also didn't want me anymore cause I was single), and asked my girlfriend to take me back.
that was about a year ago. needless to say, I'm single right now. hehehehe...
I love the way you automatically assumed my being 'hurt' or 'frustrated' when all I really was at the time was annoyed. How very condescending, and how very wrong. And that line about 'learning the rules' and 'winning' instead of complaining about the rules - obviously a polite way of implying men are generally ignorant, whining losers. This is exactly the kind of garbage I learned to ignore as a teenager, these silly word games that so many women indulge in.
What I was proposing was men making their OWN rules, and structuring their lives so that they automatically 'win' by refusing to play a losing game. There's nothing 'hurt' or 'frustrated' about that, it's simply good sense. And judging by my successful marriage, it WORKS. I still occasionally call bullshit on my wife's stupid mind games. I refuse to accept the incorrect premises uses to convince me to do things like interact with her idiot mother. I've learned to instantly identify which questions are actually traps to try to make me feel guilty. And ALL of this is based on focusing on myself as the primary cause of my own happiness, and relegating women ( including my own wife ) to a secondary status.
Guys, it's not about being a 'nice guy' or not. It's about FOCUS. My friends, male and female alike, refer to me as a 'nice guy', and my wife respects me because she understands where she stands - an equal, with no special methods for manipulating me. Focus on yourselves men. It's called rational self interest, and it makes perfect sense.
I don't want a woman who I have had to "capture" with bogus stereotypical male behavior. This implies that I have to be something besides my authentic self in order "to ge the girl." Screw that. It is a lie.
Moreover, any woman who needs to be "captured" has a head full of stereo types and bogus culture anyway. Bound to become a problem for a genuine nice guy.
If they need to be "captured" with stereotypical male stuff then they don't deserve a nice guy. Instead, they should just relax and enjoy being shit on for the balance of the relationships that they fall into, watch a few more TV shows, read a few more beauty magazines and go to a few more bars and macho events where all the "real men" hang out.
Good luck to you, sir. And with that gravity thing, too.
I humbly suggest you visit www.steelballs.com. You'll find your views are really true.
Best
Fernando
You want to talk about what is and isn't healthy? How about wasting countless hours and tons of money pursuing a goal that has no particular benefit and lots of drawbacks? Too many men have been suckered into chasing after a relationship with a woman simply because so many of our social cues and signals have been left unquestioned. I make it a point to call bullshit on this wherever I see it.
Again, it's not about being a 'nice guy' or not. It's about consciously and rationally choosing our goals based on what really makes us happy. Sure, women are usually on the list. The right woman might even make the top ten, or even number one. But that shouldn't change the way the list is made or keep us from revising the list any time we want.
But "to be nice" is different with "acting to be nice". Everything will be much easier and comfortable TO BE YOURSELF.
Do the things spontaneously. "To be nice" with somebody is not for attracting people, to be a true self without pretending and you will attract the RIGHT ONE. You will be nice to that person spontaneously if you love that person, it is not about bending your head and to beg for something.
There are great profound truths in these archetypes. In short, men are hardwired for three things: adventure, battle, and a beauty. When a man makes the pursuit of a woman his adventure, the pursuit seems exciting and rewarding, but if/when he ever "catches" his beauty they both quickly realize that things are ..boring. We all know where these relationships go.
I, too, have similar stories to some of the other guys that have commented. In short, it wasn't until I stopped chasing females that I started having real success with them -- and I dated plenty before then, some relationships that lasted for quite a while. The idea that finally clicked in my mind is this one: "your not ready to meet you future spouse until your ready to be single for the rest of your life." That phrase may parse a bit oddly, but the point is that until you are a rich enough (and I don't mean monetarily), self-sufficient enough, all-around healthy individual, you're not READY to be the one-half of a relationship that you're required to be for that relationship to be a healthy, balanced one. Whether this means being a "nice" guy or not isn't really at the heart of it -- an all-around healthy guy (mentally, socially, emotionally, etc) is in all likelihood going to considered a "nice" guy. But he'll also embody those male characteristics that the female commenters on here have discussed.
So, guys: stop chasing after the women. Go chase after something else: a passion for rock climbing, or entrepreneurship, or writing, or whatever. Get involved in an intellectual hobby. Get involved in a physical hobby. Figure out where you are in terms of spirituality. Become a well-rounded, balanced person, and meeting the "right" kind of women -- or even The Right One -- will happen naturally, when it's supposed to.
Amen Brother! Been there, done that, got the scars, I mean Tshirt...
There is an element of 'nature taking it's course' to "hooking up" that I've always tried to just "go with" and it removed all of the stress from the situation.
I've found that I either 'hit it off' with somebody or I don't, and when I do it's often great. I never went out looking for anything in particular although if I saw somebody that I found attractive I probably made some type of move.
I like the idea of 'meeting women' more than "chasing women." If you move too quickly sometimes you waste a lot of time trying to chase someone you really don't like as a person.
There are millions of beautiful people out there. It isn't hard to meet someone naturally if you just be yourself.
I hope, you know that awesome girl you always wanted. You tried everything to get her (even being nice?) and yet... she dates the jerk.
Maybe you also know that when you are 'a nice guy' you attract the girls you do not want. And lets face it: those are 'nice girls'.
I think the explanation about the Paradox is true. But, lets not say that all women are the same. And I think the paradox applies to both genders.
I think that dating/mating is about interaction. Give her what she wants but don't throw it in her face. Let her suffer. She has to want it. Let her come and get it. You have to tease her. Seduction is a mental affair. If you cannot push her buttons, forget it. You have to make her day. This means you don't have to be always nice. ;)
Right girls?
I don't think I've ever met a person who genuinely wanted to be with someone who treated he or she poorly. I think there are a lot of other variables. A person who is not comfortable with themselves, for example, may latch on to a partner because they feel there are no other options; the whole "I don't want to spend my life alone/nobody else will want me, so it's better than nothing" mentality. Others simply do not care. They are only looking for sex, money, status, or whatever else to fill an empty gap they have in their life. Temporarily, at least.
I believe that a healthy woman who is looking for a relationship tends to shoot for a man whom she thinks she is on par with. I believe men are generally the same. Someone with similar goals, compatible interests and personality, lifestyle, etc. Sometimes this plays into appearance as well, although not always. I know some very attractive men who aren't overly concerned with a girl's physical beauty; I also know some gorgeous girls that would settle for an average-looking guy any day, as long as they have great chemistry.
Everyone wants to be treated first and foremost with respect. "Nice" is a very general term. Nice can mean courteous. Nice can mean buying someone expensive cars and flowers and chocolates. Being "nice" isn't so much important; being honest, respectful, compassionate, friendly, confident - those, in my opinion, are attractive qualities. I think a lot of people get too wrapped up in specifics as well. I'm an artist, I'm a writer. At 15, I used to think I'd love to date someone similar. Someone "insightful" and "creative". I will be 20 this year, and I have yet to date an artist or a writer. My most serious relationship was with a hilareous gamer. I am single now, and tomorrow I could meet a football player who loves to cook and play bingo. He might be the most interesting person I've ever met. Limiting yourself does no good.
They could be nice when you know them but when you ove in together you get to know their other side.
ehh, theoretically it should be easier to overcome this. while gravity and inertia are both physical laws, this phenomenon is the result of self-organizing behavior, and such would be slightly easier to change (but still not easy at all :p)
Why nice guys SUCK
Date: 2006-09-10, 9:19PM EDT
This is a long rant, so bear with me or hit your back button. I'm frustrated and in no mood for your shit either, so if you don't want to read it, well...
So I'm dating a nice guy now and it SUCKS. No other way to explain it, it just SUCKS. He's no challenge. He agrees with everything I say. He's got it all though - a decent job, a nice house, no kids, no psycho ex-wives, and he's tall and cute. Anyone ever seen that Friends episode when Alec Baldwin played Phoebe's boyfriend?? YEAH, my boyfriend is THAT nice. He's just too fucking nice. Nice is boring. I've never heard him raise his voice. He's never aggressive. He has no edge. He won't even drive over the speed limit and that fucking annoys the shit out of me, yet I sit in the passenger seat and keep my mouth shut... watching everyone whiz by us.
And don't get me started on the sex. Oh, excuse me... making love. After he cums (note I didn't mention anything about ME cumming), he rolls over and says "Oh, that was nice" with a little sigh. I KID YOU NOT, he says it EVERY TIME and then he sighs like he has just woken from a refreshing nap. I finally got so tired of missionary and him looking lovingly into my eyes and smiling as he came, that I threw him down on the couch one night and mounted him. At first he was terrified - yes, TERRIFIED. He thought something had possessed me. And it HAD -- it was sheer MADNESS. I fucked the shit out of him that night. And then he sighed and said "Oh, that was nice".
Now that we had the cowgirl position conquered (always with that sigh afterwards), it was time to move on to doggie. His ex-girlfriend never did doggie (hmmm... maybe there's a "nice" ex-girlfriend to blame for his timid niceness?? That bitch...). Anyway, I digress. I tell him I want him to fuck me from behind. Yes, I used the word "fuck" and I didn't care what he thought about it. He gets behind me and enters me, and damned if he didn't say "OH, THIS IS NICE" !!! Are there any 35 y/o men out there that haven't smacked a woman's ass when doing her doggie?? YES, and he's my boyfriend!
Tonight during sex, I think I'm gonna tell him to stick his finger in my ass when I'm riding him. THAT should be interesting.
So for the nice guys out there, my advice is this: It's great that you're nice (to an extent), but have some backbone. Don't be a spine donor all your life. When your girl is out of line, say something. Don't let her walk all over you. Occasionally, be a "bad" boy (being bad doesn't translate to abusive or criminal). Say "No" to her sometimes. Raise your voice and be heard. Say something dirty/sexy to her occasionally. Drink a few too many beers and piss out in public. Smack her ass. Don't ever use the word NICE to describe things, especially sex (okay, that may be a personal pet peeve). Have an interest in at LEAST one sport (or pretend to). Drive 5-10 miles over the speed limit once in awhile. Run an old lady off the road just for kicks (yeah, I'm kidding about this one... just ride her bumper for a few miles). Be aggressive during sex. Take off those damn white socks and Jesus sandals. Grow a goatee for a few weeks. Shave your balls. Stray from your routine and shake things up.
BE A MAN FOR GOD'S SAKE... and the women will fall at your feet.
Whew... THAT FELT NICE.
In my personal experience, I have failed to attract women when being a 'nice guy'.
However, when being total macho, show-off, jerk, I seem to get results.
I believe that women deserve all the rights, respect, and equality that they have in America today, what frustrates me is that a man who does this apparently does not have the caveman instinct to attract a mate. WHAT DO WOMEN WANT? A CAVEMAN OR A MODERN EAQUALIST?! Hah, or perhaps some mixing of the two? A caveman in bed but a modern equalist when the babies diapers need changing?
If you are a short ugly guy, unless you have some glaring talents or wonderful abilities, go look for some short ugly women to hook up with! Don't sit around wasting your time pining over beautiful women who would just dick you over anyway.
And girls do like nice guys - Confident, semi-attractive, intelligent, *nice* guys.
This whole "nice guy syndrome" is spawned from dorky idiots with no self confidence who think just because they are nice, entitles them to a beautiful woman. So they perpetually bomb out with the ladies, and then complain about it on the internet and such. Lower the bar for yourself, or improve yourself; it's that simple.
The simple rule: Do not let a woman get away with bullshit. If she is acting XYZ and you are nice to her, you are just not making it thru a filter.. and you are dismissed as a pussy man who is too scared to stand up for himself. Call a girl on her bullshit, and that IS being nice. Letting a girl walk all over you being nice, is being an asshole to yourself and a lier to her. Its dishonest. Sometimes Honesty takes courage and can be risky.
heartless-bitches.com/rants/niceguys/niceguys.shtml
--
Binh Zientek
http://www.qualitylondonapartments.co.uk
http://www.qualitycityapartments.com
Deida calls upon ancient hindu and taoist wisdom and generally breaks down what is at the root of 'confidence' and the masculine/feminine dynamic.
go to the source fellas, but until then, fake it till you make it.
Well all I have to say from what I've seen so far is that girls don't care about looks size or whatever you wanna call it. I am 6'0 tall, skinny around 160 lbs and Hispanic English second language. I think they care about the benefits when they start dating a guy. I don't personally think that their interest is based on what the guy can provide them instead, and I am not saying is money. I think is how the guy use the money to make her happy.I mean it is the same mythology when a person is looking for a new job. He/She wants to get benefits. So the point is the following. I don't consider myself smart or anything like that, although all girls that I've dated so far think I am. I have my girlfriend since I entered High School(7 years so far)(and she is the most beautiful thing that happened to me :( eventhough we argue alot sometimes:().) I recently graduated from college and I am currently working in a good Co. My girl is about to finish her major as well and still I don't see the appropriate time that I can say I am ready to get marry. So me, myself is just taking a break now because eventually I think the time is approaching and still cheating for me is not going clubbing on a night to a bar and get a chick. I rely on the fact that guys that go clubbing to get P****Y are the worst out there, and that if they rely on those places, mind as well their stage of mind is discrepancy insufficient to be a man.
I love the idea that guys and girls needs to date in their within age range (2 2). That's how I do it. And it happen that for some reason I like girls that are smarter and more sufficient in terms of mentality than me. ****Smarter***
***Also yes I've cheated on her, but guess what? I for some reason has managed to go back to her.***
So let's keep up the topic.
the strategy i found most powerfull with women is to do what people have told us in every sitcom and after school special since the dawn of time, 'just be your self' dont change your behavior just because your around a woman you are attracted to, treat her like a friend, not a friend you want to hug and share your feelings with and get all pathetic because you think thats what girls want,,, treat her like a friend you go out drinking with or play sports with or anything like that, tease her, be frank and blunt with her, make jokes, be confident and comfortable, talk about things that intrest you,,,, that is the ultimate for women, a man who is comfortable in his own skin and doesnt need to turn into a woman to feel comfortable with women
"Nice guys" also for some fucked up reason think that assertiveness is equal to aggression--Which is just wrong. And besides, women want a leader. Few of them like to lead. It sounds sexist, but HEY NICE GUY, it's OK! Most women like being taken care of and secured and for YOU the man to take the lead. That's not sexism, it's just the FACTS! So grow a spine, grow some balls, and take fucking charge!
But there are some repercussion... check this http://www.wwwpd.org
1. She may not be a nice girl
2.Do you still maintain firmness in what is right and best for you, without being selfish
(maintain your spine)
3. If you are not happy with yourself how can anyone else be happy with you?
4. Be direct about what you want, and know what you want (don’t be wishy-washy)
5. I read mentions of the appearance of the person; a strong personality (integrity,
independence, and a since of direction) is more attractive to most women than appearances
alone. Sure she may go for the hottie sometimes, but that works both ways…but in the end
a real relationship can not live on appearance alone.
6. Just remember…being a nice guy does not equal being a push over, it means being a good
friend and not taking advantage of someone, being there for them when they need you, not
when they beckon you, and listening and actually understanding the person when they need
someone to lean on.
I just want to say, I wish there were more nice people in the world, then those of us who try to be a nice person, wouldn’t second guess ourselves.
This is not the sort of music I listen to and the premise of the song bugs me (talking with an ex)but every time I hear that song; I think God Damn!-this guy has a sexy voice. And it dawned on me that, in particular, what I thought was sexy was the beginning of the song when he almost whispers.
I should also mention that is drives me crazy(in a bad way) when these guys in country music TRY to do a sexy whisper in music. I think they sound whiny and feminine.
I wondered why I kept thinking that -then realized, the difference was the guy in the 'Lips' song had a really gruff, masculine, crackly kind of voice and in the beginning it sounds like he's going out of his way to sound gentle and kind but that he's just SO masculine that it still comes out gruff.
The whiny, trying to be sexy, country music whisper, on the other hand, sounds like someone "trying" to get a girl turned on-which I can't help but get annoyed by.
So there it is- we want gruff, ruff, tough, cave men who are very sweet and gentle to us(why else would they slay dragons?).
It is easy to find the former- very hard to find it combined with the latter and most of us(unfortunately) prefer to take our chances with the former hopping he'll revel the latter-than to just settle for a "nice" guy. (luckily I did find a dragon slayer)
-Tasha
In the wild, a chimp patriarch is surrounded by women and children. If the wives go for another chimp, they are punished. The tribe is there to do the patriarchs bidding and have his children.
Post-pubertal chimps leave home and associate with other toughs, driven by newly surging hormones. Eventually they return to the tribe to challenge the patriarch. The patriarch ignores them at first but eventually he gets in a ferocious battle with the younger chimps, sometimes being chased off.
If the post pubertal chimps are victorious they kill all the children and leave the females untouched. Without children to suckle, the females are no longer tied to the patriarch.
When the mothers are no longer suckling the children, they regain interest in sex. This is because, while suckling, lactational amenorrhea takes away their interest in sex, making them available to the new males.
This is how the cocky, aggressive chimps ensure the propagation of their progeny and how the female chimps end up having their children.
Humans behave in this way too. In the Amazon live a people called the Yanomamo. They beat their wives; the women feel unloved unless they carry scars from their husbands. The men have two main interests, war and hunting.
They invade villages, kill all the children, and take the women as secondary wives.
Similarly, Western civilization has a history of these kinds of ‘barbarities’.
In 1625 Hugo Grotius cited the 137th psalm, which said, "Happy shall he be who takes and dashes your little ones against the rock." as a norm for the practice of war. A common practice in the Old Testament and Europe in the 1600s. It ensures the dominance of one tribe over another.
The rape of the Sabine women is another example of humans acting like chimps. The Romans invited their neighbors and women over for dinner and proceeded to kill or chase away all the men and keep the women for themselves.
Another example: Helen of Troy, like an aquatic duck, triggered a fight called the Trojan War. Then she ran back to her men to get them involved as well. The Greeks took the women and left most of the children behind.
The hunger for sex leads to this kind of violence. It is a desire to populate the world with one’s own children. It’s the greed of genes.
So what does this have to do with the nice guy vs. bad guy question? Well if you agree that human males have a genetically dictated desire to win over women in whatever way possible and reproduce like chimps or Amazonian tribes or Greeks or Romans do, then it only makes sense that modern, civilized humans carry this genetically dictated impulse within as well. I don't know maybe we've 'evolved' since then?
You can see how all the men in my examples were domineering to the extreme, barbaric to unconscionable levels though.
This doesn’t fly in our modern civilization supposedly; yet you see it every day in the papers, behind closed doors—men going to the very same extremes for the same reasons as Romans, Greeks, Amazonians, and chimps.
Naturally most well-adjusted, modern, civilized people temper these ‘barbaric’ instincts to one degree or another with religious or philosophical ideas, out of necessity or to avoid punishment by the state; but it’s still there under the surface for both women and men, in my opinion.
You can’t live in close proximity to so many people of your own nationality or other nationalities while behaving like the men in these examples of course. It happens though. But we have laws and social norms in America. But it still plays out; just in more sophisticated or complex ways, with more subtlety and refine.
I think this is the biological reason why a woman is attracted to a man with at least some domineering qualities over a mostly submissive man.
I by no means am advocating any of the behavior practiced by the men in my examples, nor am I trying to demean women. I'm no social Darwinist or misogynist. I am merely pointing out that there is a parallel between human and animal behavior. Fortunately, as humans we have control over our instincts, we can choose what to do with them to some degree -- ethics, morality, respect, the law, and higher things.
And the list (and relative points for each item) is different for different women. Or we really would all be trying to date the same guy, which we're not.
First of all, I agree with Nope. Well, I mean, he has the right attitude. He shouldn't have to go around playing games and pretending to be something he's not in order to get a girl. No one should do that. I mean, that's ok if you're just trying to get laid. But for anything else...that's the recipe for disaster.
Alot of the guys are here whining and moaning about how girls only want a certain kind of guy. You know what? I HATE all this stuff I am CONSTANTLY finding on the internet that tries to place the sexes in 2 separate categories. People are just people. I wish we'd all stop reading all of this "how to" crap and just get on with it, it's messing everyone up.
You know girls have problems too. I didn't get a date until I was 20! and then it was like a total turn-around, I had guys all over me. The kind of guys all the girls would want to be with. Just because my confidence was way up, and I was letting more people see my personality. So you see, it's the exact same with girls. Unlike Jesse, though, I didn't fall into the trap when all those guys would come onto me and stayed faithful to my then boyfriend!
Everybody has their faults, be it physical or otherwise. Some girls are a bit chubby. Some guys are short, whatever. But if you focus on your faults, and blame them for your problems in the dating world, THAT'S what's going to cause you to struggle. Get out there and just be comfortable with being yourself.
As for the article, yes I admit there is a strong element of truth behind it. Yes, I want a nice guy. I don't want an "alpha male" as some people have been saying. it's attractive, yes. but i don't want a guy i feel like i have to run after. I don't want a guy "who's high up enough on the social ladder to dump me at the drop of a hat but doesn't" as someone said. i just want someone who's comfortable with himself, and happy to be himself. someone who's not just a "friend" but more like a "best friend". not just someone who's there to talk to and lean on, but someone who also relates to me and shares interests and who i can just generally have a great time with and share jokes with.
guys you're only going to get that by being yourselves! and personally i think alot of us, at college age, are still figuring out what that is!
i think this has been a pretty long, badly structured rant. apologies.
as for bars being terrible places to meet people...YES. and if my single friends want to go for a night out, i find a way to cancel because guys always seem like such sleazy idiots there. either that or they seem like they'll take what they can get! i don't want anything to do with that.
ok so my summary:
IGNORE THESE STUPID DATING RULES. THEY'VE NEVER MEANT A THING AND THEY'RE JUST MANIPULATIVE.
IGNORE ALL THIS STUFF ABOUT GENETICS AND EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY TOO. i study genetics and have done a course in animal behaviour, all these figures you read online or in magazines are totally generalized and often leave out major chunks of information. i mean, i keep reading that humans are polygamous. why are we trying to make excuses for infidelity?? so what if monkeys are, we're not fricken monkeys!! look up the stuff that was found on the prairie vole and the meadow vole, that research right there is PROOF that all these statements about humans being polygamous are not justified.
and if you want to meet a real girl, sort out your self-esteems issues and be more relaxed when you're talking to them. i think basically you shouldn't seem like you're looking for anything from them, but that you're just interested in getting to know them. but do seem interested.
natural law
epic fail indeed
My conclusion: Women will always value your kindness, but will be easily distracted unless you've got an interesting personality past that.
I mean, what if you're perceived as a "nice guy" by other people to your own bewilderment - and you're sure some women find you creepy?
I genuinely like to talk to strangers, I'm nice to them and use my manners... is that creepy? That's how I act with all people, men or women.
To be honest I could care less. As was said in a previous post I'm not giving women much attention. If I never marry that's cool. I'm strong (not fat like Scott said) and slender... I'm only 5'8" and ~145lbs. In North America I'm sure that's practically starved but I'm actually quite fit and happy.
I go outside and talk to strange people because it's fun... I engage myself in hobbies all the time as well. If I never find someone then I'm cool with that. I just don't want women to feel put off because they somehow think I want in their pants.
The funny thing is that it's the ugly ones who seem to be put off... hah!
Perhaps they're trying to win a game of power too and don't see me as a suitable step-up... That's nice... why are you thinking of me that way? I don't believe I gave you any impression that I was interested. I merely made polite conversation. Don't be too full of yourself, now.
I guess I really shouldn't care but being the type of person I am I care deeply what others think of me. I don't like it if I get the impression someone is uncomfortable or doesn't like me for some reason.
The other side of the equation is that I'm not unattractive... perhaps I need to step up to the plate when some girl who equally cares for her own body and is remotely intelligent takes interest in me.
Bah, do I even want that? I'm not in a place in my life where I want to be with anyone for anything more than momentary pleasures anyway... a few good hours of causal sex here and there is good enough. I don't need anything else. :P
That may seem rash but there are lots of women who seem to be out for the same thing.
*shrug*
It's all so complicated (and yet so predictable).
that was well written good job.
It's a truism that one has to be attractive to a woman for reasons other than being nice before nice becomes a factor. But even then, being nice is going to make it LESS likely you will get the girl. And I'm not talking about the doormat factor. I'm talking about confident nice, the kind that doesn't involve being a pushover. Like remembering her birthday and scheduling a romantic dinner: at a restaurant, after the game.
But, for most women, even a non-doormat, attractive nice guy is LESS likely to get the girl than the guy who isn't. Given the choice of two guys equally attractive, women will STILL go for the jerk. Because...
Nice guys are dangerous.
See, a woman can date a jerk, see it through to the end, and never risk her self-esteem. Because all relationships that don't lead to "til death do we part" end. And when a relationship -- be ie a one-night-stand, an awkward friend with benefits, or a full-on relationship -- ends, the woman has to ask herself why.
With a jerk, the answer is easy. It's because he's a jerk. The woman gets the benefits of the relationship while it's going, and when it's over she gets the benefit of being the victim.
But if she dates a Nice Guy and it doesn't work out...now whose fault is that?
Judging by the majority of comments that are in agreement to some degree or another with the article, I'm comfortable in assessing this "solution" as a very valuable lesson learned for me. In addition to the all important "being yourself," the importance of being more than just the nice guy makes very clear logical sense. Contrasting from some other people discussing this, I think I may have done a reverse INTO nice-guy-ism. Up until last year when I started college, I sat on the sidelines and just figured that a good girl and a relationship would come naturally. But honestly, I laid eyes on this one girl at the beginning of the year, and immediately I knew I had to take control. From that point, I felt like I had to bend over backwards for her at every turn and that in the end, I would be rewarded for my efforts (as well as for my humor, because I think I have a pretty good sense of it). But I now realize that the world just doesn't work like that. While I think I've always been a nice person and I shouldn't change that about my character, I realize that in the relationship arena, and in normal everyday life for that matter, I have to be a man. I have to be confident, in charge of my own life, honest with myself AND her (great point by Adam #81), and probably most importantly, be myself.
Now I'm no stud, but I'll just say that my situation is a work-in-progress. But anyways, I have gone through dozens of scenarios in my head as to how to "woo" or whatever, and with every meaningful, legitimate piece of advice I receive, I look back in terror at my old perceptions of love. "How could I have even considered that! Was I insane!? That would be suicide! Stupid! Stupid!" I've been racking my brains.
But the jist of what I'm trying to say is that while there is ALOT of advice out there, but THIS MAKES SENSE TO EVERYONE! TO GUYS AND GIRLS! Don't be a pushover, be nice to her but don't not act like the man you are.
Once you found you other half I say people should be free. Freedom is the only thing that makes us truly happy and open-minded. Marriage is created by church or religious believes and i really think this custom along with religion will die out sooner or later. To have a family, marriage and everything that comes with it in my opinion is unnecessary. Couple with or withoute kids where Man or woman can go there separate ways anyday will mostlikely to stay together. People should not be tied up together so much in everyday bullshit with no room to move, they should not sleep in the same bed every single night, they will loose their "attractive fields".
* Look for a partner with good potential for the future, whichever future you pursue.
* Don't "settle down" always work on your relationship and yourself, if you quit the game you lose. Relationship is constant work
and discovery. Remember! nobody is perfect, don't be stubborn - compromise.
* Feed each others passion don't stop the fire burning.
* Give each other space and freedom to live your lives and i think it will keep you both together maybe forever.
Maybe I'm wrong...
While that blog does make a good point there's a difference between a "nice guy" and guy who is a pushover. A girl isn't going to want a guy that has no confidince (usually) and gets walked all over. They want someone who'll stand up for themselves. After all, if they don't stand up for themselves you can't expect them to protect the girl.
But don't blame the girl, the blog is right, it's nature.
Growing up, girls are made to believe (by the media and people around them) that they need a strong, manly man to protect them and take care of them, finding a guy who is nice is secondary. (or maybe looks are secondary? But that depends on the girl.)
When they are older they dream of finding Mr. Perfect; strong/confident, good-looking, and nice. But that's a rare find so girls usually just settle for 2 out of 3.
I think the article's main point is pretty much correct. Women are generally turned off at signs of weakness and this is pretty understandable behavior, after all, who wants those traits for their children?
Still, I think many (most actually) women are too quick to judge and dismiss 'nice' guys. Not all 'nice' guys are weak, some actually have great strength of character and confidence in general, except with respect to their attractiveness.
Fortunately for these guys it all works out well in the end. There are women out there that have similar strength of character and intelligence who can look and actively search past that superficial behavior since these are the women worth being with anyway.
You'll notice them all too easily (if perhaps rarely, there's not that many) when they don't dismiss you. Instead you'll see they'll show their interest by either being 'nice' themselves (only temporarily, to make you feel comfortable) or by testing your inner character in some way.
If you (the 'nice' guy) are ready for a relationship (you still have to come to terms with reality) you'll recognize her at this point and things just might work out for you.
Still, this doesn't mean you should hold off on working on your self confidence regarding your attractiveness until such a girl comes along. You'll still recognize the good ones even if not filtering them through your apparently weak behavior. And they will still recognize you.
Estland
I don't think it's necessarily a question of being superior. Instead, I would say the guy has to at least be equal.
Also, if you're not attracted to the person in the first place, it doesn't matter how nice they are. Being nice alone with no other supporting characteristics, is not going to attract a mate. Think of it this way - smart, funny guy, who's mean is NEVER going to get the girl. Smart, funny guy who's nice will have women falling all over him. Not-so-smart, not-so-funny guy who's nice will have lots of female friends. He'll be 'one of the girls'.
You gals should read the blog at http://www.tuckermax.com
Smart, funny guy (Duke law school grad with good looks & family money) who treats beautiful women like dirt and they're falling all over him.
Definitely some hilarious dating stories, particularly the one involving Miss Vermont...
1. Fag hags, Gay (bi-trend) When I was sitting home alone crying, they were dyking out, fuck em! I don't want gay kids, it's genetic, also a sign your extremely stupid, I wont' gay out because "it's trendy". Imbecile!
2. Nag Nag Nag Nag, the second you get married, the balls in her court, now she went from great GF to Devil of a bitch wife. Want a divorce.......50-60% of everything sucker!
3. Cant' cook, clean, or do much of anything
4. 15% more body fat than men in an OBESE society, an trust me, she wants kids, enjoy your Jabba the Slut
5. Bitch shield....try putting up with that for over a decade an see if you like AW.
Only one type of guy gets married - MANGINA - A useful idiot or "beast of burden" that is the typical "wuss" niceguy that sucked up to AW his whole life (an rejected) but one day gets a "degree" an then got nabbed by some AW, an within three months she gets pregnant (entrapment) , marriage, kid, life ruined loser. These guys are imbeciles an are treated an expected to be just "worker bee's. Eddie Murphy - Pussytrap, check it out, still applies today.
Tesla said himself that women will dominate the world in a "hive" heir achy, sure enough it came true thanks to something called "casual sex". Now women control a heavily in demand product an men cut each others throats in order to get it. An AW scoffed at me saying that saying Tesla was obviously an idiot.. obviously she didn't know who Tesla was, again, the vast majority of AW are imbeciles, they don't have to be smart, they just have to spread they're legs whenever they want something.
However AW didn't count on the fact theres over a billion foreign women out there who'll slit everyones throats to get a rich kind American Man
HAHAHA, suck it up bitches!
That's why the divorce rate is over 50%. Because women marry based on how well the MAN can provide for her. And not how well he can satisfy her on a *emotional* level.
Now what interesing is, in 65& of all relationships the *woman* wears the pants. And 90% of all divorces are filed by the woman!
But there's another side to this coin. In my experience, the Women that come from a higher income bracket, tend to gravitate towards nice guys. Because they're not programmed to *Marry up* like the Women who come from moderate income families. The women who come from moderate income families will marry the richest guy they can find. No matter if he's an ugly duckling. And they'll have the *hot* guy on the side to satisfy their physical and emotional needs. The best thing a Man can do is look for a Independent woman. Perferably in a big city, where it costs alot to live. That way they don't need your Money to get them where they want to be in life. I stay near San Francisco, and whenever I go there the well off chics are the nicest and well adjusted women you'll encounter. Because they're looking for someone to connect with on a emotional level. Since they don't need a mans income to be happy.
Women don't want pushovers but they don't want jerks. I think the problem with this "nice guy" dilemma is the word "nice". It's a really vague word. What women want is a guy who isn't a jerk but who does nice things and who is thoughtful. That kind of nice. But nice is only one component. Just as physical attraction is only one component. If a guy is only good at being one thing, it makes him not as desirable as another guy with multiple good qualities. I'm sure the same thing goes the other way around. (i hope!)
Everyone seems to be ready to look for triggers. X behaviour (nice/tough) triggers Y response (rejection/submission). It's like reading a book of rules all over again. If women look to men's attitude as a clue to their behaviour down the road, men start to adjust their behaviour to anticipate that female speculation. If I'm nice, he says to himself, she'll think I'm bad in bed and no fun. But actually I'm an animal in bed (after all the repression elsewhere), and I'm being nice to attract her or at least not scare her off. It's all a huge, overcomplicated game of military intelligence and fake-outs that create more layers of separation from the reality.
It's easier to play this nonsense than to think freely, realize that there are many variables and your behaviour is sometimes to blame, and sometimes it's her lack of vitality or adventure which is killing the chances. Some women are desperately addicted to a type, some are afraid of that type and want a nice guy, some of them want to abuse you, some of them want to be abused. Nice guys of the world, it's not always your fault!
Don't you wonder at the fact that you're not getting any, at the same time as these women are afraid of the fact that you're not getting any? Nice guys, have you tried talking about sex to the hot women who are rejecting you? Don't you notice how uncomfortable, timid, unromantic, unprepared for sex and giggly these girls are?
You can start to ask, if our assumptions are true, why is it that nice guys finish last? What do you, as nice guys, even want out of sex? Perhaps these bad-boy-quarterback lovers are not only looking for a hot man, but for daddy. Do you, nice guys, want to be the girl of your dreams' daddy, or have a torrid affair? We're talking about women here as if they were dead meat, all equal once you get your foot in the door. But they're not all great in bed, fun to be with, and exciting.
There's such a hang up about scoring (which is biologically understandable), that it's just assumed that said scoring equals happiness. Not everyone is getting together, and of those that are, plenty are having a miserable time in bed and a miserable life all at once, despite their predictions from those ambiguous clues (like niceness and masculinity).
It's interesting that this is all in English. In English North America, you have the most sexual freedom in the world, yet polite anglo-saxon manners are the norm. It's a very middle class world where young and not so young girls aren't aware of the truth about sex (something like, every guy wants it all the time, and nice doesn't mean harmless), and are themselves always worried about behaving well to make mummy and daddy proud. This is too simplistic: guys behave nice don't get any. I've seen hot hot girls with nice wimps, studs and lamos. I've seen football hunks with girls way beneath them. So , so many seem to be passionless and inane, but with fine office jobs or other and the sense that whatever they have they are wasting. It's not that all american girls are bad, it's that this vortex of american culture has now produced sex in advertising, unromantic pick-up nightstands, and blathering whiny sex looking to fit in between animal pleasure and political correctness. The Europeans, the Latins, the Africans all have the same disappointment with sex and many more taboos than our free society, but they know that sex is sex. In America we look for happiness in sex instead of sex in sex. That little guy might be great in bed and you don't have to marry him. Have some fun girl! Nice guy, the jock next to you is only happier having more sex (if he indeed is) on condition that he's stupid. Stupid equals happy. Some of the greatest, smartest, most joyful and assertive people remain celibate. They ain't all nuns and priests, neither.
Why can't we see the sex in sex. Why are we looking so far into the future for every erotic experience. Why are we criminals if we didn't get the girl and heroes if we did? Why are we old maids if he didn't ask us out, settlers if we accepted, and sluts if we had fun?
Plus, if nice guys with no confidence don't get the girl, then that's all the more proof that younger nubile girls aren't getting any either. Although it's not illegal, they don't date older guys almost at all. They stick with their own age bracket. And holy crap, ALL young guys have HUGE CONFIDENCE PROBLEMS. Listen to that quarterback with the face of Adonis, he doesn't feel confident he can get the girl. Yeah, yeah, women like an Adonis who lacks confidence but that's not the point. The point is it's not the niceness which is the only problem. The guy can never be nice enough to make it easy. There's always discomfort between the sexes. Now, as for the hot babe who just goes for the sex without a problem. Since I'm assuming she's an anglo saxon (most likely) in America, isn't it interesting how confident she is that she will get the guy, but how easily she is embarrassed in all other things? If you didn't bag her, is it really the end of the world? Have you really failed?
Someone's mother would offer the best answer here. I know fathers need their daughters to be nice good girls because of paternalistic desires to freeze the daughter's confusing and threatening sexuality at a manageable girlishness. But are we asking our sons to be nice guys because we don't want to be seen as politically incorrect parents who raised a jerk, or we just find it easier to accept our sons as neutered (like we do our daughters), or some other reason?
And most importantly: funny doesn't go with sex for a lot of women (bad sense of humour on their part), and you're wrong about looks: funny is funnier if he is uglier. Which comedians do you find the funniest? The handsome guy who looks like he's just laughing at everyone, or the fat, bubble faced Horatio Sanz? If you're trying to be funny, for my money, you'd better be ugly. This sounds horrible to my ear but I think it's true: even if the ugly guy doesn't get the girl, when he jokes with her, he gives her a warm feeling that her hunky boyfriend never will. I know, for a guy that's second place and he wants to feel good somewhere a lot lower than the lungs, but still. If she laughs at her ugly friend's jokes sincerely, she's totally unimpressed with her handsome beau's lame comedy.
Or being nice when you are already married?
When you're married it has nothing to do with that initial moment of interaction.
Marriage may be a sign of a deep mutual bond and great honesty or it may not.
But it is definitely not about spontaneity. The singletons out there are playing a much more delicate game, with almost no back up from those old words, commitment and habit. I think that they have very little to listen to from married people.
A variation of this works in reverse for women. Women's magazines and advice columns will have all kinds of tricks women can do to attract guys, but the truth is, none of them will work if the woman isn't attractive within certain parameters. Even within those parameters, a woman is given more slack for being a pain in the ass if she is at the high end of looks, and less if she is at the low.
Work for yourself,get a "I dont give a damn" attitude to women and you will be hounded by them no matter how you look.
Women..... why do they exist?
Cheers.
first of all, i would argue that the gender norms you invoke are social as opposed to biologically-influenced. i believe the concept of a woman who wants a Big Strong Man To Protect Her as opposed to the Weak Sniveling Man Who Worships Her is just as polarizing and problematic as saying that women are biologically programmed to prefer the muscle-bound clod over the skinny artist dude.
i'm not arguing that humans aren't animals; i am arguing that sometimes the woman DOES end up with the dork who worships her, and biology isn't at the root of the 'nice guy' pathos.
this 'nice guy' crap is wholly rooted in misogyny - there has to be something horribly wrong with the woman because her weak, skewed, female judgement forces her to want the guy SHE wants and not the one being nice to her, or the most 'deserving' of her. it implies that women lack the good sense to like who they want to like, because silly them, the less attractive guy is always the perfect one.
life isn't a 1950's movie.
you don't hear of 'nice girls' not being able to get the guy half as much as you hear the nice guy's tale of woe, and it irritates me. you're attracted who you're attracted to. if the person you care about doesn't return your feelings, spend your time on someone a little worthy. don't translate it to, "these silly women don't know what's good for them! must be biology!"
You missed the point. The point is that the "nice guy" that you claim is being exalted by this blog entry is actually a cultural myth.
I would assert that the solution is much simpler. The problem with the dichotomy is the definitions. "Nice guy" has come to equal "pushover/wuss". "Bad ass/desirable guy" has come to equal "asshole/jerk/partier/overly violent/etc." These definitions over simplify what it means to be "nice" and "attractive."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1Te8ldI9ys
J
All of you frat boys should watch these YouTube videos http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNTs7thH3MQ and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QRphRVPs18 to fully understand what it takes to get the girls in this city.
Another factor that hasn't had much metion here: Age. YOUNG women are still obeying the instinct that tells them to hook up with The Toughest Caveman In The Cave, so that they'll be protected & fed. Later in life, the "Nice Guys" pull ahead. Believe me, "later in life" comes up fast...
eh if u be nicwe guy and den ask 4 sex its so easy some times no sometimes yes but what u get 4 looose
The problem of the nice guy it obvious, he represses his hormones&instinctive needs and tryes to make up for that with cordiality and submissive behaviour. Which results in a perfect friend but not in somebody that is able to, even for a short period let his urges dominate both. For a nice guy to succeed, he will have to let free all of his desires in order of true passion to arise. This is why women get bored, and fall for the wrong bad ones, the ones with no viceral inhibitions. It might sound a bit utopic, but the main point is, a realation is deemed to fail, if you, not even at one point, are dominant to your partner.... (obviously you need common sense to not rape your partner)
The 'nice guy' conundrum is utterly fascinating to me, in a sort of observe-it-from-a-safe-distance train-wreck kind of way.
What I also find fascinating is that this post is tagged:
Musings
Psychology
Science
Sex
women
But not 'Men' or 'Male Behaviour' -- which is the topic of the above very well-written post [it almost gives me hope].
Great take on the Nice Guy conundrum. Thanks for the good site-drops here as well. Here's one I didn't see listed, www.learnwomen.com.
Cheers
I give women the dirty sanchez....the smell of poo attracts even more hoes.
GFY. Women like respect and honesty. People can sense when you're playing mind-games, trying to figure how to be the person someone else could possibly want, rather than just being yourself.
Not a lot of guys would want a doormat nice girl either, who has no personality other than sniveling after whatever guy has caught her fancy.
it kind of helps to be seen with cool people have cool things. bling bling like a bike ;-)
Women like guys who are _nice to them_, while simultaneously being a jerk to other women.
You see a nice guy is nice to me, and nice to other women, so I'm nothing special. A true jerk is always a jerk, so I'm nothing special. But a full time jerk, who is rude to everyone, but then suddenly nice to me, means that I must be _special_.
Think about it. You see a hot girl, dating a complete jerk. But he's only a jerk to you and everyone else. To her he's slightly less a jerk...
As you said, women want men who don't HAVE to be nice to them to be nice to them. More often than not, they've associated men who treat them poorly as being of higher stature than they are. Ergo, I would argue that at least 1 out of every 3 times, you can treat a woman like crap, and she'll grovel at your feet. No need to be all that masculine, actually.