<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:28:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-11038067</link><description>ah thankyou so much, i have to analyse a song in my music class at school and i really wanted to get some shit on the fibonacci sequence so i could impress my teacher.....also helped me to understand the song thanks alot!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yboT</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:28:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-9459563</link><description>987 is actually the 17th step of the Fibonacci Sequence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great and very interesting video otherwise!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. @2:36, do you think the band was trying to make an ironic statement over what people would do to this song? Obvious that isn't true, as Maynard puts a ton of time and effort into writing the songs this way, but just thought i'd point that out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jordan D</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 19:33:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-9067239</link><description>This is correct; Adam or Danny (I forget which) mentioned in an interview once that before it was named Lateralis, they gave the song a working title of 9-8-7, based on the beat count.  &lt;br&gt;Also note, much like Aenima and Aenema, the song is not spelled the same way as the album :)  Those guys are just full of little tricks like that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:27:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-7905799</link><description>Someone may have already posted this, but the missing section occurs at 3:12......from 9:24.....derivatives 3 &amp; 2, but i don't know if that's significant in the sequence of the song.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:32:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-6334364</link><description>thats fuckin cool man</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">g-house</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:10:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Danny Carey is quoted in an interview saying "987" was a working title indeed because of it's 987/8 time signature, and admits to understanding that 987 is indeed the 16th Fibinacci sequence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M Lawrence</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:10:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The album in minutes is 78.96666...and so on. Spiral Out, Keep Going. Just like the number.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron B</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:25:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, someone had said that 9-8-7 isn't a time signature.  It's not, really, but the section of the song is in a repeating pattern of a 9/8 measure, an 8/8 measure, and a 7/8 measure.  It repeats every three bars.  Written out on sheet music, this is marked as "9 8 7 / 8," so it does seem pretty plausible that the number 987 is taken into consideration.  Maynard is pretty nuts, I wouldn't put it past him to throw in things like that, that are pretty convoluted and subtle.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eli</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:59:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone notice the 34 bars of 4 at the start of the Lateralus? My guess is that there will be an overall scheme with the climax of the song being at the Golden Section (GS of 55 is 34, 34 is 18 etc.). I also think the separate sections of the song will be a fibonacci number also. I'll let you know what I find...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Bell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:21:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356173</link><description>&lt;p&gt;try ordering the cd 1,2,3,5,8,13,4,6,7,9,10,11,12. the first half is the Fib Code but all the songs that are supposed to be grouped are grouped and the flow between each song matches up amazingly. i have found it is the best way to listen to the cd out of all the other orders listed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sammib</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:15:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356170</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay The earlier comment about time signatures should be corrected, the time signatures I believe are 9/8, 8/8, and 7/8, either that or the song is abnormally fast rhythm. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Akshay Wadekar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:06:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also to the comment about Tool's influence in Hindu culture and so forth, I just noticed that the next track on the album has a very "tabla" sounding drum, I can almost guarantee it is a "tabla". The track after that, has a resounding "bend" of a drum note that can be attained using a "tabla".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Akshay Wadekar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:27:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356168</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In response to the time signature argument, I believe he's focusing on how many beats per measure assuming that the quarter note gets the beat, so 9/4, 8/4, 7/4, I believe, but I could be mistaken, it is hard to count tool time signatures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;All very interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Akshay Wadekar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;6,7,5,8,4,9,13,1,12,2,11,3,10 is not the fibonacci sequence. However if you plot those points on a cartesian axis where point 6 corresponds to point (6,6) etc., and connect these points in the order with spiral like curves. You get something that looks something like the lateralus eye.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also something while I don't think anyone has mentioned is the fact that maynard starts singing 1.618 mins into the song.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M. Kowalski</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356166</link><description>Tool definitely like to work with the Hindu-influenced mystical bend.  The work of Alex Gray ( see: Lateralus art work ) is a key visual component.  I also heard that Lateralus can be listened to in a way such that it's complementary to moving energy through the 7 primary chakra centers.  The order is:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;13,6,7,5,8,4,9,3,10,2,11,1,12,13&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can tie this numerical projection to the Qabbalah, to the Fib sequence, to nucleotide ordering, to AI decision trees, to fractals, to construction Golden sections. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's something about &amp;phi; which reaches deep within the collective unconscious, the noumenal mind (Kantian condition of experience?), or our deep programming.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven G. Harms</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:51:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356165</link><description>Actually,  looks like the Greeks used it in their architecture.  So make that thousands of years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:34:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356164</link><description>This sequence is very popular in music and film. All of the Stanley Kubrick are supposed to be using it as well.  They call it the "Golden Ratio".  Many artists believe it is the secret to successful art. If you look, there are dances, paintings, music, and movies that all use it. Tool is doing what mathematically aware artists have been doing for a few hundred years, and mother nature since the beginning of time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:03:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356167</link><description>&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateralus#Track_information_and_interpretations" rel="nofollow"&gt;This Wikipedia link&lt;/a&gt; may help explain what I heard.  Read the first bullet point there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim F.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:03:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356162</link><description>Someone once told me that you're supposed to listen to the tracks in a spiral formation starting with 6, then 7, then 5... but it doesn't make sense -- if you go through the track listings that way, you end up with 1, then 12... and 13 is unheard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe you're supposed to listen to 10, 11, and 12 together since it's considered to be one song in three parts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I dunno.  Just something I heard.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim F.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Math and Philosophy Behind Tool&amp;#8217;s Lateralus</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus#comment-4356163</link><description>1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OK, this guy is really reaching!   987 (nine hundred eighty-seven) is a number in the sequence.  9-8-7 is not .. nor is it a time signature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps he gives a clue with the words:  Over thinking, over analyzing&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, I'm curious how  6,7,5,8,4,9,13,1,12,2,11,3,10  is a rearrangement of the 13 tracks in a Fibonacci Sequence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The human mind is great at seeing patterns (whether or not they are real).  Perhaps the syllablic patterns were intentional.  The rest is reaching (IMHO).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CarlM</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>