-
Website
http://dmiessler.com/ -
Original page
http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-math-and-philosophy-behind-tools-lateralus -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ax0n
5 comments · 1 points
-
Michael Blume
5 comments · 1 points
-
cooperati
179 comments · 2 points
-
dapxin
39 comments · 1 points
-
drew_reece
3 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
OK, this guy is really reaching! 987 (nine hundred eighty-seven) is a number in the sequence. 9-8-7 is not .. nor is it a time signature.
Perhaps he gives a clue with the words: Over thinking, over analyzing
And, I'm curious how 6,7,5,8,4,9,13,1,12,2,11,3,10 is a rearrangement of the 13 tracks in a Fibonacci Sequence.
The human mind is great at seeing patterns (whether or not they are real). Perhaps the syllablic patterns were intentional. The rest is reaching (IMHO).
Maybe you're supposed to listen to 10, 11, and 12 together since it's considered to be one song in three parts.
I dunno. Just something I heard.
13,6,7,5,8,4,9,3,10,2,11,1,12,13
You can tie this numerical projection to the Qabbalah, to the Fib sequence, to nucleotide ordering, to AI decision trees, to fractals, to construction Golden sections.
It's something about φ which reaches deep within the collective unconscious, the noumenal mind (Kantian condition of experience?), or our deep programming.
6,7,5,8,4,9,13,1,12,2,11,3,10 is not the fibonacci sequence. However if you plot those points on a cartesian axis where point 6 corresponds to point (6,6) etc., and connect these points in the order with spiral like curves. You get something that looks something like the lateralus eye.
Also something while I don't think anyone has mentioned is the fact that maynard starts singing 1.618 mins into the song.
In response to the time signature argument, I believe he's focusing on how many beats per measure assuming that the quarter note gets the beat, so 9/4, 8/4, 7/4, I believe, but I could be mistaken, it is hard to count tool time signatures.
All very interesting.
Also note, much like Aenima and Aenema, the song is not spelled the same way as the album :) Those guys are just full of little tricks like that.
Also to the comment about Tool's influence in Hindu culture and so forth, I just noticed that the next track on the album has a very "tabla" sounding drum, I can almost guarantee it is a "tabla". The track after that, has a resounding "bend" of a drum note that can be attained using a "tabla".
Okay The earlier comment about time signatures should be corrected, the time signatures I believe are 9/8, 8/8, and 7/8, either that or the song is abnormally fast rhythm. Thanks.
try ordering the cd 1,2,3,5,8,13,4,6,7,9,10,11,12. the first half is the Fib Code but all the songs that are supposed to be grouped are grouped and the flow between each song matches up amazingly. i have found it is the best way to listen to the cd out of all the other orders listed
Anyone notice the 34 bars of 4 at the start of the Lateralus? My guess is that there will be an overall scheme with the climax of the song being at the Golden Section (GS of 55 is 34, 34 is 18 etc.). I also think the separate sections of the song will be a fibonacci number also. I'll let you know what I find...
Yeah, someone had said that 9-8-7 isn't a time signature. It's not, really, but the section of the song is in a repeating pattern of a 9/8 measure, an 8/8 measure, and a 7/8 measure. It repeats every three bars. Written out on sheet music, this is marked as "9 8 7 / 8," so it does seem pretty plausible that the number 987 is taken into consideration. Maynard is pretty nuts, I wouldn't put it past him to throw in things like that, that are pretty convoluted and subtle.
The album in minutes is 78.96666...and so on. Spiral Out, Keep Going. Just like the number.
Danny Carey is quoted in an interview saying "987" was a working title indeed because of it's 987/8 time signature, and admits to understanding that 987 is indeed the 16th Fibinacci sequence.
Great and very interesting video otherwise!
P.S. @2:36, do you think the band was trying to make an ironic statement over what people would do to this song? Obvious that isn't true, as Maynard puts a ton of time and effort into writing the songs this way, but just thought i'd point that out.