dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Diego — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:36:26 -0000

The mainstream media has been told not by the FBI not to discuss the fact that Bin Ladin is nothing but a "Lee Harvey Oswald" type of patsy.

Rather than spending too much time in documenting the facts, Webster Tarpley has an excellent Ebook on the attacks on 9-11 and what he believes are the reasons behind them. Including a rogue element within the U.S. Military Intelligence complex who actually overthrew the U.S. Federal Government on 9-11, while attempting to assasinate George W. Bush in the early morning hours while he was staying at the Colony Beach and Tennis Club in Florida, having breakfast with his brother Jeb - the Governor of Florida.

After the attacks on 9-11, Bush spent the rest of the day on Air Force 1 attempting to flee for his life, only to eventually show up at the White House in the evening hours.

Since that time, he has been under the influence of this rogue group within the military industrial complex, who Barack Obama will find himself answering to shortly.

The name of book is 9-11 Synthetic Terrorism - Made In The USA by Webster Tarpley.

It's a free download that you can access by typing the name of the book into Google.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

LORD REV YAHWEH — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:38:53 -0000

THERE ARE A BUNCH OF ZIONISTS SATANIC TERRORISTS IN OUR GOVERNMENT AND IN GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE WORLD AND WE MUST STOP THESE DRACONIAN MEASURES NOW

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

LORD REV DYJUAN D BARNES YAHWE — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:40:09 -0000

9-11 was a false flag terror operation and none of the alleged terror groups have had anything to do with it

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

LORD REV DYJUAN D BARNES YAHWE — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:38:36 -0000

911 was carried out by the american government and the conspitors which helped to pull off 911 and are helping to implement the draconian steps we must stop the alpha draconians now

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

alzimir de souza carvalho — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:17:09 -0000

ternado para missões de policias en segredo oficial....

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Neville — Mon, 12 May 2008 10:56:21 -0000

Bin Laden was on the FBI's most wanted list for the USS Cole and the embassy bombing in Africa before 9/11. I remenber looking on the FBI's website during the summer of 2001 and seeing him there.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Karin Friedemann — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:00:48 -0000

Bin Laden is not known to have any connection with 9/11. The videos where he allegedly confessed were proven by German to have been falsely translated by US "intelligence". I LOVE the story about the passport that flew out of the plane and landed on the street in New York, and the one about the alleged suicide bomber that started a letter, "In the Name of God, my family, and myself" was clearly a method to sort the retards from the normal people.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

pat l — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:31:35 -0000

USAMA BIN LADEN: In the name of Allah (God), the most beneficent, the most merciful. Praise be to Allah, Who is the creator of the whole universe and Who made the Earth as an abode for peace, for the whole humankind. Allah is the Sustainer, who sent Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) for our guidance. I am thankful to the Ummat Group of Publications, which gave me the opportunity to convey my viewpoint to the people, particularly the valiant and momin (true Muslim) people of Pakistan who refused to believe the lies of the demon (Pakistani military dictator General Pervez Musharraf).

I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel. There is also a warning for those Muslim countries, which witnessed all these as a silent spectator. What had earlier been done to the innocent people of Iraq, Chechnya and Bosnia? Only one conclusion could be derived from the indifference of the United States and the West to these acts of terror and the patronage of the tyrants by these powers that America is an anti-Islamic power and it is patronizing the anti-Islamic forces. Its friendship with the Muslim countries is just a show, rather deceit. By enticing or intimidating these countries, the United States is forcing them to play a role of its choice. Put a glance all around and you will see that the slaves of the United States are either rulers or enemies of Muslims.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Roxy — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:09:13 -0000

Of course bin Laden had nothing to do with it. That tape they showed of some guy gloating over it was not bin Laden, and that was so obvious, it was laughable. How much longer is everyone going to continue to pretend like our government had nothing to do with 9-11?

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Michael McCullough — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:11:14 -0000

Why is that so hard for some people to comprehend? Do you not get that they hate us?
It's called Bush Derangement Syndrome. Anything bad that has happened in the last 75 has to be blamed on Bush. Does everyone believe that Saddam Hussein was no threat to us? Go check out documents released by the government and translated by -- not the New York Times or the Washington Post -- but by bloggers. Does everyone believe that Bush made up the evidence needed to go to war with Iraq? Read what the Democrats were saying the 1990s. Do the Bush Haters know that Clinton signed into law in 1998 a bill to overthrow Saddam? Do you think that the media is lying to you? Well, you're right, but not in the way you think they are. Check out AP's use of a photographer with strong terrorist ties. AP has also used people with terrorist ties to do their reporting for them. One of AP's reporters operates an anti-Israel blog. The BBC fired an editor for using fake photos from Iraq. And how can we forget the fake photos used by Reuters. How many of you Bush-haters know about the recent phony story in the liberal magazine The National Review? I'll bet that most of you believe the myth that the rich pay less taxes due to Bush's tax cut. I'll also bet that most of you aren't smart enough to figure out this IRS chart showing that the wealthiest 1% of Americans paid 29.01% of the country's income taxes in 1994 but paid 36.89% of the income taxes in 2004. That's right, the rich pay MORE in taxes now than they did under Clinton.
Bush hasn't done everything right. But he does not deserve the scorn concocted by the Democrats and the mainsream. It's obvious from reading some of the comments here that many of you have no concept of history, cannot remember anything that happened before yesterday, and believe anything that nutjobs (like the 9/11 Truthers) say about Bush. We have soldiers fighting in the Middle East for your right to be stupid.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Peaceful Lion — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:24:22 -0000

Are you kidding me? Ask the FBI if Saddam has any connection and see what they say...

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Sasha Leiter — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:10:45 -0000

"WOW… ok.. simple test here… go to the FBI’s most wanted list… and walah! our dear Mr Bin is definitely on that list… BUT…. look at what he is wanted for… any mention of 9/11 or planes or buildings? didn’t think so…. come now people lets all grow up…." Considering the FBI is a government controlled group who would have had to take part in the conspiracy and cover-up, don't you think that they wouldn't be the ones to subtly expose the thing? This isn't complicated. He LEADS the group that did it. When people talk about how catching Bin Laden won't make a difference, it's because he doesn't control everything in the organization and directly help everyone pull off every attack. He does however lead the group that launched the attack. That's why he's wanted. You're just thinking about this in a really biased manner, because you're specifically looking for proof that 9/11 wasn't caused by him. When you look at this from any sort of reasoned perspective, it's blatantly obvious what this actually means.

"LOL, you guys crack me up. Watch Loose Change, or shut up. We need a Big Banner to hang over Ground Zero that says, “JET FUEL CAN’T MELT STEEL. PERIOD.” It’s F**king Science you monkey tards. If someone wants to go ahead and show me one circumstance where they can heat burning jet fuel to a temperature that would weaken steel, please be my guest, until then, shut up." As anyone with any knowledge of engineering or science in general will be able to tell you, you don't need steel to be liquid for it to lose it's strength. The planes burned at a temperature hot enough to weaken the steel. Weak steel can't support the top of a skyscraper like normal steel can. You should try reading/watching the many, MANY videos that completely debunk loose change step by step that are made by people who know what they're talking about.

Fuck, 9/11 was pulled off by pissed off people from the middle east. Why is that so hard for some people to comprehend? Do you not get that they hate us? Or do you just think they lack the competence to pull it off? The Bush Administration did lie to us, as part of a conspiracy. That was the invasion of Iraq, not 9/11. Stop wasting your time on 9/11 and focus on Iraq.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

James — Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:48:02 -0000

Someone confessed to the crime of killing Jon Benet Ramsey and it turned out NOT to be him.

Aren't the Bush family and the Bin Laden families buddies? Wasn't the Bin Laden family allowed to leave hurriedly after 9-11 from the U.S.? Weren't all of the 9-11 terrorists Saudis? Isn't the same Bush family helping Verichip plan to electronically tag every person? http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/08/01/chip...

Think big picture, dudes. Perhaps 9-11 was designed to start something far more insidious than war with Iraq. Why is it that no one hears about the rest of Iraq except Baghdad?

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:29:19 -0000

I just wrote this to the author:

Hi,

I just read your Bin Laden to 9/11 link article. An admission of guilt is NOT hard evidence, especially when it comes to these kinds of terrorist activities. If you look back you'll see that almost every time there is an attack several groups step forward to claim responsibility. Heck, you want to have some fun you can Google "several groups claimed responsibility" (put it in quotes) and see what you get.

You can also look directly at our domestic judicial system. There have been criminals in the past that have admitted guilt to a crime but because they could not link any bit of evidence to them they couldn't be prosecuted. Generally a problem occurs when the person admitting guilt can't get the story right, but we don't have Bin Laden in custody to see if he knows the fine details that only the attacker would know.

So why are we going after him at all then? Because he is a prime suspect or as the police might put it, a "person of interest." If your wife shows up dead and you skip state, you're not guilty of a crime, they may not have any evidence at all, but they'll certainly chase you down. That's really about where we're at in the whole thing, although it has certainly lost almost all steam in the last few years.

As for the media being just a bobbling head with a pre-recorded voice, we're on the same page there. That's kind of a multifaceted problem. Firstly, shocking stories create the most income for them. We all know this. However, with it being so easy to blame the government if something comes out wrong, financially there's all the incentive to just say it and none to question it. Plus it costs money to question what is being fed. Why bite the hand that feeds you? Of course we can also bring up the clear political bias of many media outlets but that's a few paragraphs on it's own. I'm sure you're already very well versed on those issues.

Anyway, I hope that really sums it up. Maybe you can 'call off the dogs' because I really don't see it as something that deserves outrage. If you want some good reading I might suggest how Bin Laden considered Saddam an "infidel" and that he was not in-fact harboring him. That being the case, why are we in Iraq at all?

Hope it helps.
J

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Jason Powell — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:25:08 -0000

If there were a conspiracy here, the wanted poster would say "for 9/11," whether they had hard evidence or not.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Chris — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:31:55 -0000

People use your brain this is just a dumb ass story, basing all your facts from an HTML page. Dont be simple minded, if you can read you can think and now think about what you just read. Does the theorist use good and solid logic? Does the writer provide you with hard facts? Because to me this is the dumbest theory yet. Dont you think if the FBI or the government was trying to cover this up that they would removed the details about the boomings in Africa and just have something like "Wanted for terrorist attacks around the world."

Thank for yourself, dont follow the guy with the biggest bullhorn.

Oh to answer your question about why this is not on the news, because it is a stupid theory. It is not even worth being called circumstantial evidence it is more like circumvented evidence.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Alistar Baker — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:50:04 -0000

Wait a second, something doesn't mesh here. In 2001, the US Government claimed Bin Laden was behind the attacks. The FBI poured more resources into the 9/11 investigation than anything prior. The UK came to the same conclusion.
Bin Laden himself admitted to his involvement in 04. Later that year Bin Laden says he trained the hijackers. They even have video of Bin Laden with some of the hijackers prior to the attacks.
So why would Tomb say there's no hard evidence? I mean we invaded Afghanistan looking for Bin Laden (among other things).
OH I see. This is all circumstantial evidence.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Morgan — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:08:33 -0000

LOL, you guys crack me up. Watch Loose Change, or shut up. We need a Big Banner to hang over Ground Zero that says, "JET FUEL CAN'T MELT STEEL. PERIOD." It's F**king Science you monkey tards. If someone wants to go ahead and show me one circumstance where they can heat burning jet fuel to a temperature that would weaken steel, please be my guest, until then, shut up.

We need MythBusters to tackle this since the 911 commission was too busy assisting in a cover up.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

independantMind — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:39:05 -0000

MR DOUBTFUL:
"I feel that Osama IS the one we need to be after. The democrats just keep coming up with pure crap to try to get back in office. That is when we will have a REAL mess. We need to remember the last democrap we had in office. What a mistake THAT one was!"

hahahahahahahahahahhaah ... wait... hahahahahaha LMAO... Clinton was a mistake? lmao the fact that you are holding your shiny new ipod and garnishing your bank account with a modicum of income is solely Clintons doing. So ... pulling his dick out is a mistake and attacking countries for oil (a giant metaphorical dick was layed to Iraq and Afghanistan) is of course never a mistake....

lmao cocaine... skull n bones... come on... clinton just wanted to bone a bitch... thats human nature... this napolean shit however.. is not.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

independent mind — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:35:54 -0000

WOW... ok.. simple test here... go to the FBI's most wanted list... and walah! our dear Mr Bin is definitely on that list... BUT.... look at what he is wanted for... any mention of 9/11 or planes or buildings? didn't think so.... come now people lets all grow up....

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Spectre — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:23:09 -0000

Here's an idea on how to try and clear up the issue on why the FBI did not include 9/11 on Osama's Wanted Poster: Call the FBI and ask why.

Any questions or comments you have on the matter would be best referred to them as they and only they can answer from a position of authority on this matter. Nearly anyone else's answer to the question would come off as speculative.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Jerry Hauer — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:13:46 -0000

good to see the truth starting to seep into mainstream america. no UBL is not listed as the FBI as even a suspect; shouldnt that tip-off anyone? instead look at what the PTB has gained from their war of terror and look at what you have. it's not even close.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

HD — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:11:46 -0000

The poster is updated.
The reward was upped to 25 million $ after 9/11.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

SurferGurl — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:51:57 -0000

To brad tittle:

They never did pin anything of import on Al Capone, now did they? They couldn't because he was smarter than the cops.

But that's neither here nor there.

You say the war on terror is silly. No sir, it's not silly at all. Its cost, so far, is past $500 billion (http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1121/p01s03-usmi.... -- sorry, it's an old link -- I'm not really in the mood to do more fishing for you) and 3,679 American lives (http://www.icasualties.org/oif/BY_DOD.aspx) so far. I'm not laughing. And if you're laughing then your as heartless and cruel as Bush and Cheney.

People speaking their minds about their opposition to how America's reaction to what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, can't lose a war, you idiot, and to attack those of us exercising our FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS marks you as a terrorist.

Re: The FBI Can’t Link Bin Laden to 9/11? Why Is This Not News?

Marko Kettunen — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:13:29 -0000

Well, all of you Republican liars can go and suck my dick. Everyone living outside of your silly darn country knows that it's just George W. Bush going after the oil and since most of the redneck Americans are just stupid shitpricks, no-one gives a rat's ass about what he is doing. Power, yeah, you want to be the world police? Come here then and I will kick your sorry asses. You want to have all the resources and take down every little piece of shit that disagrees with your old and mighty emporium? Ha, how about just a reality check from time to time. Half of the world hates you, dumfucks. No reason, we just do. Or.. It might have something to do with your policies, like ignoring the UN and just starting your own wars. Who the fuck gives a shit about the rest of the world, when you have George and his mighty powers?! Come on, blow the whole fucking world up, you still got the nukes so come on... I dare you, you fucking monkeys.