-
Website
http://dmiessler.com/ -
Original page
http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-fbi-cant-link-bin-laden-to-911-why-is-this-not-news -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
All Comments
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted.htm
"Dylan Avery, Korey Rowe, and Jason Bermas bring you the most powerful 9/11 Documentary yet. Updated!!!!"
This is the movie that is supposed to start being showed in theaters, but the other week, one of its
producers, Kerry Rowe, was arrested.
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=3202 - there is an article talking about the arrest.
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/250707_rowe... - that's about his release.
"Rowe extends his thanks to the 9/11 truth community and all others involved in making phone calls, writing stories and otherwise pressuring his release from military custody after he was hauled in on accusations of desertion. Rowe is an Army veteran who served in combat tours in both Afghanistan and Iraq."
Read on PNAC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_Ne...
look at the people involved, and what they proposed in 2000
More questions: http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041...
The events of 9/11 (whoever instigated them) allowed the government to instigate a preplanned invasion of iraq, not to mention gaining control of afghanistan and the ability to build an oil transportation pipe after talks with the taliban broke down
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1984459.stm
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinlade...
"Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world."
Huh, funny that... No mention of 9/11 at all!
I would have thought they'd have updated it by now if it were him huh...
http://www.911truth.org/
Right...because the Republicans are doing such a super swell job right now!
Because feelings are the best things we have, right? Feelings got Lenin in power. Feelings declared Octavius emperor. Feelings got Hitler appointed (Godwin me, I dare you!).
Feelings are responsible for the worst atrocities mankind has ever committed. Why should we make the mistake of hunting down a diseased Arab when we have perfectly healthy World Controllers in our own front yards? They're capable of much more damage than a bearded lunatic.
Will someone PLEASE suck Bush's dick so we can impeach him...
And to "James the knowth", you should go read the FBI most-wanted-terrorists list. Osama is on there, but only for attacks outside the United States. He is NOT wanted in connection with 9/11.
...durrr...perhaps because he didn't do it....?
get rid of your fake religions and those pink elephants and the republicans
and you'll have your freedomfries served.
Where the government failed is not that they lied, but they got caught; and with the relatively new era of the Internet, people have the power to talk about it without being filtered by the bought out media. (what comes in the future is bombardment of garbage media and propaganda AI bots).
FTA:
"However, as the events of September 11 demonstrated with horrible clarity, the United States also confronts serious challenges from international terrorists. The transnational Al-Qaeda terrorist network headed by Usama Bin Laden has clearly emerged as the most urgent threat to U.S. interests. The evidence linking Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden to the attacks of September 11 is clear and irrefutable."
There is no conspiracy here. Mostly there are a bunch of whining idiots trying to find a way to blame their government for anything. It is too bad that many people here will embrace some conspiracy instead of recognizing the exigencies of war. Sure the War on Terror is silly, but they had to do something. We will never truly win this war because there will forever be people like those commenting here that never come to undestand that some people don't like us. They don't like because we are free to be idiots. They don't like us because we are free to make really bad mistakes.
Not least of those mistakes is our belief that "they" will recognize that "freedom" is better than Tyranny.
I used to be into that 911truth shit, but then I just stepped back and realized that there were flaws in their thinking.
"It is not news because US mainstream Media is owned by very rich supporters of the government who do not want the US people to know anything about what is happening politically."
And I'm sick of people saying shit like that. If you want to change this country go out and do something more than be on fucking digg.com all day in order to post meaningless comments.
That's the connection. You people are completely misinterpreting this. The fact of the matter is Osama Bin Laden did not pull off 9/11. He simply leads the group that did. And has confessed to it.
the tapes in question are just him expressing his approval for the actions taken in 9/11, not claiming responsibility.
They never did pin anything of import on Al Capone, now did they? They couldn't because he was smarter than the cops.
But that's neither here nor there.
You say the war on terror is silly. No sir, it's not silly at all. Its cost, so far, is past $500 billion (http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1121/p01s03-usmi.... -- sorry, it's an old link -- I'm not really in the mood to do more fishing for you) and 3,679 American lives (http://www.icasualties.org/oif/BY_DOD.aspx) so far. I'm not laughing. And if you're laughing then your as heartless and cruel as Bush and Cheney.
People speaking their minds about their opposition to how America's reaction to what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, can't lose a war, you idiot, and to attack those of us exercising our FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS marks you as a terrorist.
The reward was upped to 25 million $ after 9/11.
Any questions or comments you have on the matter would be best referred to them as they and only they can answer from a position of authority on this matter. Nearly anyone else's answer to the question would come off as speculative.
"I feel that Osama IS the one we need to be after. The democrats just keep coming up with pure crap to try to get back in office. That is when we will have a REAL mess. We need to remember the last democrap we had in office. What a mistake THAT one was!"
hahahahahahahahahahhaah ... wait... hahahahahaha LMAO... Clinton was a mistake? lmao the fact that you are holding your shiny new ipod and garnishing your bank account with a modicum of income is solely Clintons doing. So ... pulling his dick out is a mistake and attacking countries for oil (a giant metaphorical dick was layed to Iraq and Afghanistan) is of course never a mistake....
lmao cocaine... skull n bones... come on... clinton just wanted to bone a bitch... thats human nature... this napolean shit however.. is not.
We need MythBusters to tackle this since the 911 commission was too busy assisting in a cover up.
Bin Laden himself admitted to his involvement in 04. Later that year Bin Laden says he trained the hijackers. They even have video of Bin Laden with some of the hijackers prior to the attacks.
So why would Tomb say there's no hard evidence? I mean we invaded Afghanistan looking for Bin Laden (among other things).
OH I see. This is all circumstantial evidence.
Thank for yourself, dont follow the guy with the biggest bullhorn.
Oh to answer your question about why this is not on the news, because it is a stupid theory. It is not even worth being called circumstantial evidence it is more like circumvented evidence.
Hi,
I just read your Bin Laden to 9/11 link article. An admission of guilt is NOT hard evidence, especially when it comes to these kinds of terrorist activities. If you look back you'll see that almost every time there is an attack several groups step forward to claim responsibility. Heck, you want to have some fun you can Google "several groups claimed responsibility" (put it in quotes) and see what you get.
You can also look directly at our domestic judicial system. There have been criminals in the past that have admitted guilt to a crime but because they could not link any bit of evidence to them they couldn't be prosecuted. Generally a problem occurs when the person admitting guilt can't get the story right, but we don't have Bin Laden in custody to see if he knows the fine details that only the attacker would know.
So why are we going after him at all then? Because he is a prime suspect or as the police might put it, a "person of interest." If your wife shows up dead and you skip state, you're not guilty of a crime, they may not have any evidence at all, but they'll certainly chase you down. That's really about where we're at in the whole thing, although it has certainly lost almost all steam in the last few years.
As for the media being just a bobbling head with a pre-recorded voice, we're on the same page there. That's kind of a multifaceted problem. Firstly, shocking stories create the most income for them. We all know this. However, with it being so easy to blame the government if something comes out wrong, financially there's all the incentive to just say it and none to question it. Plus it costs money to question what is being fed. Why bite the hand that feeds you? Of course we can also bring up the clear political bias of many media outlets but that's a few paragraphs on it's own. I'm sure you're already very well versed on those issues.
Anyway, I hope that really sums it up. Maybe you can 'call off the dogs' because I really don't see it as something that deserves outrage. If you want some good reading I might suggest how Bin Laden considered Saddam an "infidel" and that he was not in-fact harboring him. That being the case, why are we in Iraq at all?
Hope it helps.
J
Aren't the Bush family and the Bin Laden families buddies? Wasn't the Bin Laden family allowed to leave hurriedly after 9-11 from the U.S.? Weren't all of the 9-11 terrorists Saudis? Isn't the same Bush family helping Verichip plan to electronically tag every person? http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/08/01/chip...
Think big picture, dudes. Perhaps 9-11 was designed to start something far more insidious than war with Iraq. Why is it that no one hears about the rest of Iraq except Baghdad?
"LOL, you guys crack me up. Watch Loose Change, or shut up. We need a Big Banner to hang over Ground Zero that says, “JET FUEL CAN’T MELT STEEL. PERIOD.” It’s F**king Science you monkey tards. If someone wants to go ahead and show me one circumstance where they can heat burning jet fuel to a temperature that would weaken steel, please be my guest, until then, shut up." As anyone with any knowledge of engineering or science in general will be able to tell you, you don't need steel to be liquid for it to lose it's strength. The planes burned at a temperature hot enough to weaken the steel. Weak steel can't support the top of a skyscraper like normal steel can. You should try reading/watching the many, MANY videos that completely debunk loose change step by step that are made by people who know what they're talking about.
Fuck, 9/11 was pulled off by pissed off people from the middle east. Why is that so hard for some people to comprehend? Do you not get that they hate us? Or do you just think they lack the competence to pull it off? The Bush Administration did lie to us, as part of a conspiracy. That was the invasion of Iraq, not 9/11. Stop wasting your time on 9/11 and focus on Iraq.
It's called Bush Derangement Syndrome. Anything bad that has happened in the last 75 has to be blamed on Bush. Does everyone believe that Saddam Hussein was no threat to us? Go check out documents released by the government and translated by -- not the New York Times or the Washington Post -- but by bloggers. Does everyone believe that Bush made up the evidence needed to go to war with Iraq? Read what the Democrats were saying the 1990s. Do the Bush Haters know that Clinton signed into law in 1998 a bill to overthrow Saddam? Do you think that the media is lying to you? Well, you're right, but not in the way you think they are. Check out AP's use of a photographer with strong terrorist ties. AP has also used people with terrorist ties to do their reporting for them. One of AP's reporters operates an anti-Israel blog. The BBC fired an editor for using fake photos from Iraq. And how can we forget the fake photos used by Reuters. How many of you Bush-haters know about the recent phony story in the liberal magazine The National Review? I'll bet that most of you believe the myth that the rich pay less taxes due to Bush's tax cut. I'll also bet that most of you aren't smart enough to figure out this IRS chart showing that the wealthiest 1% of Americans paid 29.01% of the country's income taxes in 1994 but paid 36.89% of the income taxes in 2004. That's right, the rich pay MORE in taxes now than they did under Clinton.
Bush hasn't done everything right. But he does not deserve the scorn concocted by the Democrats and the mainsream. It's obvious from reading some of the comments here that many of you have no concept of history, cannot remember anything that happened before yesterday, and believe anything that nutjobs (like the 9/11 Truthers) say about Bush. We have soldiers fighting in the Middle East for your right to be stupid.
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel. There is also a warning for those Muslim countries, which witnessed all these as a silent spectator. What had earlier been done to the innocent people of Iraq, Chechnya and Bosnia? Only one conclusion could be derived from the indifference of the United States and the West to these acts of terror and the patronage of the tyrants by these powers that America is an anti-Islamic power and it is patronizing the anti-Islamic forces. Its friendship with the Muslim countries is just a show, rather deceit. By enticing or intimidating these countries, the United States is forcing them to play a role of its choice. Put a glance all around and you will see that the slaves of the United States are either rulers or enemies of Muslims.
Bin Laden was on the FBI's most wanted list for the USS Cole and the embassy bombing in Africa before 9/11. I remenber looking on the FBI's website during the summer of 2001 and seeing him there.
ternado para missões de policias en segredo oficial....
911 was carried out by the american government and the conspitors which helped to pull off 911 and are helping to implement the draconian steps we must stop the alpha draconians now
9-11 was a false flag terror operation and none of the alleged terror groups have had anything to do with it
Rather than spending too much time in documenting the facts, Webster Tarpley has an excellent Ebook on the attacks on 9-11 and what he believes are the reasons behind them. Including a rogue element within the U.S. Military Intelligence complex who actually overthrew the U.S. Federal Government on 9-11, while attempting to assasinate George W. Bush in the early morning hours while he was staying at the Colony Beach and Tennis Club in Florida, having breakfast with his brother Jeb - the Governor of Florida.
After the attacks on 9-11, Bush spent the rest of the day on Air Force 1 attempting to flee for his life, only to eventually show up at the White House in the evening hours.
Since that time, he has been under the influence of this rogue group within the military industrial complex, who Barack Obama will find himself answering to shortly.
The name of book is 9-11 Synthetic Terrorism - Made In The USA by Webster Tarpley.
It's a free download that you can access by typing the name of the book into Google.