<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in The Economics of the NYT: This Can&amp;#8217;t Be True</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_economics_of_the_nyt_this_can8217t_be_true/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:21:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Economics of the NYT: This Can&amp;#8217;t Be True</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-economics-of-the-nyt-this-cant-be-true#comment-5825284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, so this is just evolution telling the print industry that it's time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Miessler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:21:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Economics of the NYT: This Can&amp;#8217;t Be True</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-economics-of-the-nyt-this-cant-be-true#comment-5819658</link><description>&lt;p&gt;favorite part  "And here's the thing: a source with knowledge of the real numbers tells us we're so low in our estimate of the Times's printing costs that we're not even in the ballpark."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wow....Bump the costs to 500 and you could send every subscriber a decent netbook...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael S Black</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:26:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>