http://danielrm26.disqus.com/dmiessler.com/about/enThu, 12 Jul 2007 00:26:23 -0000http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-difference-between-web-10-20-and-30#comment-4354824Why can't crypto as an underlying design element be part of the idea? We're ok with other design elements being a core piece of what makes it Web 2.0 or 3.0 or 4.0 whatever. How about, instead of just Web 3.0 is the semantic web where data is labeled and sexy, we make it Web 3.0 is the semantic web where data is labeled and sexy and secure? We're just labeling a method of working with data. There's no reason at all security can't be considered an underlying design element of the idea.DaveThu, 12 Jul 2007 00:26:23 -0000http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-difference-between-web-10-20-and-30#comment-4354823Mind, dude, web 3.0 isn't a piece of software anyone is pushing out, it's an abstract idea.dakWed, 11 Jul 2007 11:22:30 -0000http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-difference-between-web-10-20-and-30#comment-4354822and web 3.0 will hopefully include crypto as an underlying design element lest we still end up with this stupid trust all your personal data to the company running facebook situationmindWed, 11 Jul 2007 04:09:07 -0000