<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in The Difference Between CSRF and Clickjacking</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/the_difference_between_csrf_and_clickjacking/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:55:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Difference Between CSRF and Clickjacking</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/the-difference-between-csrf-and-clickjacking#comment-4359885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"For the moment, the best defense against clickjacking attacks is to use Firefox with the NoScript add-on installed. Users running that combination will be safe, said Hansen, against "a very good chunk of the issues, 99.99% at this point.""&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;taxonomyName=Spam%2C+Malware+and+Vulnerabilities&amp;amp;articleId=9115700&amp;amp;taxonomyId=85&amp;amp;pageNumber=2" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;taxonomyName=Spam%2C+Malware+and+Vulnerabilities&amp;amp;articleId=9115700&amp;amp;taxonomyId=85&amp;amp;pageNumber=2"&gt;http://www.computerworld.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-=T=-&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cooperati</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:55:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>