<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in Security: OS X Leopard Does Memory Randomization?</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/security_os_x_leopard_does_memory_randomization_03/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 10:56:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Security: OS X Leopard Does Memory Randomization?</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/security-os-x-leopard-does-memory-randomization#comment-9093543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mac OS 9 and before had that "feature" in order to handle all the GUI interfaces elements in limited memory.  Handles were pointers to pointers, reason being the memory blocks had to be moved around to make space.  You locked a handle before access and unlocked it afterwards.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 10:56:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>