Community Page
- dmiessler.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I think this is a very helpful link. It fixes all the keyboard mapping problems. Even for VMware server 2.0 http://communities.vmware.com/message/1091425
- Test.
- "Yes, it helps people through altered perception of the world, but so do three glasses of wine." ___ Oh, so atheists do not drink alcohol because it is too much like religion?...
- burden is on those who make the assertion, not on those who deny
- • Theism is not a religion. Atheism is not a religion for the same reason. 'Theism' is an abstract noun which refers collectively to each organized religion which espouses the existence of...
dmiessler.com | grep understanding
dmiessler.com/about/My Respect for Christopher Hitchens Just Went Up Quite a Bit
Started by Daniel Miessler · 7 months ago
One of my favorite writers is Christopher Hitchens. I came to know him through his latest book on religion, titled “God Is Not Great“. His writing in that book is purely spectacular; I’ve never seen anyone with such a firm mastery of English.
Anyway ... Continue reading »
Anyway ... Continue reading »
1 year ago
As much as I'm impressed by his willingness to test his own ideas empirically, I still have a hard time grasping the fact that "is waterboarding torture" is even a debate. When you forcibly inflict pain on someone to get information, that's torture, regardless of whether it's justifiable or not.
All Hitchens call really claim though is that he experienced the inhalation of water, since he 1) consented to the ordeal, 2) had a "safe signal" to indicate when he wanted it to end, 3) was not detained and held against his will, 4) was only subjected to the exercise once (at least, that's what the article implied), and 5) wasn't considered an enemy combatant by his "torturers", which, I would venture, weighed in his favor.
Still, impressive that he wanted to put his ideas to the test. It's more than, well, pretty much anyone else can say.
1 year ago
I agree with ncloud. It should be CLEAR that waterboarding is torture.
I'd be interested in seeing a debate between Hitchens and someone who has gone through the procedure and asserts that it is NOT torture. Hitchens is a masterful debater, but if the other person holds to their claim that the procedure is NOT torture, then the only conclusion that Hitchens can come to (assuming that he holds to his position that it is torture - and grants that the other person is not lying) is that a procedure that a reasonable person (though perhaps not all reasonable people) would perceive as torture IS torture.
Furthermore, as ncloud correctly points out, the procedure that Hitchens (and other reporters and military personnel) underwent falls short of duplicating the conditions under which "enemies" undergo waterboarding.
1 year ago
True, I know it's torture and I didn't even have to have it done to me. Fair enough.
All I'm saying is that I admire his ability to test his own model and change his mind.
1 year ago
The incredible thing is that the video does not LOOK much like torture. It looks like a VERY weak version of what we've seen portrayed as waterboarding in the media, and even THIS version of waterboarding was apparently extraordinarily stressful. The video is at the following link:
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/video/2008/hitchens_video200808