<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in My First Cool Idea</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/my_first_cool_idea/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 00:47:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My First Cool Idea</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/my-first-cool-idea#comment-4356272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If every "first" visit became a multiple query interrogation of the servers used to host the sites (versions, redirection testing, etc) before a host made a connection, you'd be wildly unpopular instantly I suspect.  If you think the dig effect is specular today, you'll have seen nothing yet.  This would essentially bring every new site under attack the first time it was popular.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you're a believer in a score based system, my guess is that only the escrow/trust system scales. Everyone doing it on their own simply doesn't scale.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 00:47:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My First Cool Idea</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/my-first-cool-idea#comment-4356271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, a couple of things occur to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(1) The site that serves up the ratings better be pretty darn secure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(2) It better not be possible for another site to pretend that it is the ratings-serving site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(3) If this worked for a while people might get complacent about net security so that when it was finally broken it might be a REAL mess.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;... just thoughts .. (I don't think that (3) is as serious as (1) and (2).)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CarlM</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:36:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>