<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in Language: Ending With A Preposition</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/language_ending_with_a_preposition/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:38:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Language: Ending With A Preposition</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/language-ending-with-a-preposition#comment-4353477</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem may come from a lack of understanding about the Low Germanic origins of English syntax ( and, as Jason noted, attempting to use Latin as formation rubric against which that language is applied ). What Churchill is really doing is abusing the phrasal facility of English verbs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In low German or Dutch you can say:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Ik leg m'n boek neer"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;or&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"I lay my book down".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The verb involved is the separable verb "neerleggen" meaning "to lay / set down"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Taking Churchill's example, the verb involved is not "put" but rather "&lt;em&gt;put up with&lt;/em&gt;"  As we lack a facility for turning "put up with" into a solid, single verb ( like &lt;em&gt;neerleggen&lt;/em&gt; ), I'll use _-es, à la programmer-eese.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;This is the sort of English which I will not put_up_with (&lt;em&gt;the infinitive of the phrasal verb&lt;/em&gt;).&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven G. Harms</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:38:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Language: Ending With A Preposition</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/language-ending-with-a-preposition#comment-4353475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's perfectly legitimate to end with a preposition (many times).  The rule is mostly a myth when applied to English and likely stems from a time when English was taught with the more formal structure of Latin in mind.  That said...&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br&gt;A couple from Georgia and a couple from the Northeast were seated side by&lt;br&gt;side on an airplane.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The girl from Georgia, being friendly and all, said, "So, where y'all&lt;br&gt;from?"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Northeast girl said, "From a place where they know better than to use a&lt;br&gt;preposition at the end of a sentence."&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The girl from Georgia sat quietly for a few moments and then replied:&lt;br&gt;"So, where y'all from, bitch?"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Powell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:20:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Language: Ending With A Preposition</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/language-ending-with-a-preposition#comment-4353476</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find that most people don't give a crap about dangling prepositions anymore,  but if I were to find myself around people that care about such things, I'd probably completely change the phrase so it sounds right:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"I will not put up with this sort of English."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 08:38:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>