<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in Internet Explorer 7 Security</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/internet_explorer_7_security/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:35:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Internet Explorer 7 Security</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/internet-explorer-7-security#comment-4350116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess the argument (for changing security layers instead of upgrading the buggy or insecure features)is that the more shady sites will bork because they use SSL1.0 or 2.0... but like the article says, it's easy to add in SSL3.0 or TLS&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:35:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>