<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in Interesting New Spam Business Model</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/interesting_new_spam_business_model/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 05:45:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Interesting New Spam Business Model</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/interesting-new-spam-business-model#comment-4355466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As others have said, "pump and dump" spam certainly isn't new, but it's annoying.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm getting a fair few messages over the last week or so from someone who doesn't seem to have configured their spamming tool properly... it just has placeholders like:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;06/03/2007 (13:53 GMT  +03:00)&lt;br&gt; 1.0 &lt;br&gt;Content-Type: text/html&lt;br&gt;Date: %CURRENT_DATE_TIME&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;%MESSAGE_BODY&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Muppets! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Precious</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 05:45:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interesting New Spam Business Model</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/interesting-new-spam-business-model#comment-4355465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not remotely new, but interesting in 2 ways:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1.  There's no need for a money trail leading from spam to spammer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2.  A spammee needn't trust the spammer to benefit him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's how this works:  A gullible person (let's call him Adrian) reasons as follows:&lt;br&gt;* I know this is a scam&lt;br&gt;* ...but I know a lot of people will fall for it&lt;br&gt;* so the stock price will rise&lt;br&gt;* I'm more alert than most&lt;br&gt;* so I will be buying before the rise, and can profit&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is, I think, quite elegant psychology: like all the best scams, the victim effectively cons himself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW: the right-hand column also obscures the reply textbox in Firefox 2.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 02:48:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interesting New Spam Business Model</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/interesting-new-spam-business-model#comment-4355464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not new. It even had a movie made about it in 2000 - look for "Boiler Room" on IMDB.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;your right hand nav displays over the oversized text entry field in Firefox too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhasper</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:56:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interesting New Spam Business Model</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/interesting-new-spam-business-model#comment-4355463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This SPAM model has been going on for a good while...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When I first found out about it, I couldn't help but think it would be good to catch as much such SPAM as possible.  On detection of a new stock buy that stock ASAP, actually going along with the SPAMer but be sure to sell before the spammers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm currently unsure how immoral that would be!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(BTW: Your column to the right displays over the top of the message entry box in Safari 3.0.3 on a Mac)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adrian Bool</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:59:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interesting New Spam Business Model</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/interesting-new-spam-business-model#comment-4355462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Um ... NEW?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CarlM</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:23:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>