<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in If I Were Into Cameras&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/if_i_were_into_cameras8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:11:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: If I Were Into Cameras&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/if-i-were-into-cameras#comment-4389249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm torn between this camera and the Nikon D80. After reading the review at Digital Photography Review, and comparing the images, the D90 looks about the same as the D80. Sure, the D90 has video, but that's not a big sell for me. The automatic sensor cleaning is an attractive feature the D80 lacks, but I'm not sure it's worth the extra money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond90/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond90/"&gt;http://www.dpreview.com/rev...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sandman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:11:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>