<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in Google&amp;#8217;s Inevitable Betrayal</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/google8217s_inevitable_betrayal/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:57:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Inevitable Betrayal</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/googles-inevitable-betrayal#comment-4350501</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And the answer is.. they archive all chats from all interfaces.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Hurrah for a Google Alert finding this comment for me again)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhasper</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:57:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Inevitable Betrayal</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/googles-inevitable-betrayal#comment-4350500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I drank the punch &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; bought the shoes.  Google shoes, hippy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Powell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:18:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Inevitable Betrayal</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/googles-inevitable-betrayal#comment-4350499</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also - is there a general comments feed for all comments on your site?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhasper</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:53:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Inevitable Betrayal</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/googles-inevitable-betrayal#comment-4350498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also - are they actually archiving all chats, or just chats done from within the gmail interface? I'm not clear on that..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also - if you do use the chat option in gmail, you get the option to make your chat "off the record", meaning that it won't be saved in your gmail (nor in the other party's gmail, if they're chatting from within gmail as well).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If people are going to get huffy, they could at least get huffy about things that are actually a problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhasper</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:51:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s Inevitable Betrayal</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/googles-inevitable-betrayal#comment-4350497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's also dependant on the legislative environment Google lives in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I, too, implicitly trust the current management of Google. However, I don't trust the US government - not neccessarily anything specific against that government, I just don't trust governments in general.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sure we can all imagine scenarios in which the government of the day decided it was neccessary for themt o obtain complete access to all gmail archives etc - it's not too much of a stretch, given what the current government has tried to get access to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The rest of this thought is left as an exercise for the reader.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zhasper</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:38:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>