<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dmiessler.com | grep understanding - Latest Comments in An Infosec Prediction: More Human-Based Attacks</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/</link><description>dmiessler.com/about/</description><atom:link href="https://danielrm26.disqus.com/an_infosec_prediction_more_human_based_attacks/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:59:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: An Infosec Prediction: More Human-Based Attacks</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/an-infosec-prediction-more-human-based-attacks#comment-4358359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am very intrigued by this position that you stipulate. One reason being I am an IT guy and the other, I consider myself immune to either form of coercion. &lt;br&gt;      I sum it up to the reality that if this scenario presents itself to me I will be in a very tricky situation which will ultimately result in my death. Considering the loyalty that I present to any establishment that I associate myself with, I would not be inclined to act against it. Secondly, I can not be threatened or manipulated by means of acts of violence against my loved ones or asset. (Especially since I have no assets.)&lt;br&gt;     I am a firm believer in the "kill the hostages" policy that I coined upon learning about worldly events such as the weapons transport that was seized by terrorists a few days ago of the coast of Africa. If I were in charge, several cruise missiles would have found their way to that ship immediately after verifying that a terrorist seizure had in fact taken place. &lt;br&gt;     If I ever got the phone call that went like this, "Hi Mark. We have your wife here with a gun to her head and you have one day to upload the virus to your company's network...." My response would succinctly and cleverly entail, " You can have it your way, Dr. Venkman. Shoot the bitch, I will not be pawed at." and hang up the phone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:59:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Infosec Prediction: More Human-Based Attacks</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/an-infosec-prediction-more-human-based-attacks#comment-4358361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Say... has this happened to you?&lt;br&gt;Sounds just a touch to probable to be fiction. Yikes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Eckstrom</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:28:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Infosec Prediction: More Human-Based Attacks</title><link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/an-infosec-prediction-more-human-based-attacks#comment-4358360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think option two is the most likely, and should already be practiced at any company that is large enough.&lt;br&gt;However, $50K does sound like a tempting offer ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maxo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:56:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>